A Theoretical Support for Cultural Influence on Implementation and Acceptance of Assessment Centres for Malaysia Public Sector

Mohd Hanafiah Ahmad, Mohd Rashid Ab Hamid
{"title":"A Theoretical Support for Cultural Influence on Implementation and Acceptance of Assessment Centres for Malaysia Public Sector","authors":"Mohd Hanafiah Ahmad, Mohd Rashid Ab Hamid","doi":"10.37698/ashrej.v1i2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to provide a theoretical support on how culture influence the implementation and acceptance of assessment centres (ACs) in Malaysia. This paper aims to contribute to this research gap by exploring the implementation and acceptance of ACs in Malaysia, as an example of an Eastern, and developing, country. In this context, to analyse how culture influence the design and implementation of ACs, the model of cultural fit is reviewed to explain how culture influences human resource practices and ACs practice. Findings from the literature review show that model of cultural fit can be used to explain how physical and socio-political may influence internal and organisational work culture and, therefore, human resource practices. On the other hand, to understand the influence of culture on acceptance of ACs, organisational justice theory and employee engagement theory are reviewed and used to explain how candidates react to selection process. Findings from literatures search shows that culture may have influence on how ACs participant perceived fairness of the process by which outcomes are reached, or decisions are made","PeriodicalId":146510,"journal":{"name":"Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37698/ashrej.v1i2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a theoretical support on how culture influence the implementation and acceptance of assessment centres (ACs) in Malaysia. This paper aims to contribute to this research gap by exploring the implementation and acceptance of ACs in Malaysia, as an example of an Eastern, and developing, country. In this context, to analyse how culture influence the design and implementation of ACs, the model of cultural fit is reviewed to explain how culture influences human resource practices and ACs practice. Findings from the literature review show that model of cultural fit can be used to explain how physical and socio-political may influence internal and organisational work culture and, therefore, human resource practices. On the other hand, to understand the influence of culture on acceptance of ACs, organisational justice theory and employee engagement theory are reviewed and used to explain how candidates react to selection process. Findings from literatures search shows that culture may have influence on how ACs participant perceived fairness of the process by which outcomes are reached, or decisions are made
对马来西亚公共部门评估中心实施和接受的文化影响的理论支持
本文旨在为文化如何影响马来西亚评估中心(ACs)的实施和接受提供理论支持。本文旨在通过探索马来西亚作为一个东方和发展中国家的实施和接受ACs来弥补这一研究缺口。在此背景下,为了分析文化如何影响ACs的设计和实施,我们回顾了文化契合模型,以解释文化如何影响人力资源实践和ACs实践。文献综述的结果表明,文化契合模型可以用来解释身体和社会政治如何影响内部和组织工作文化,从而影响人力资源实践。另一方面,为了理解文化对ACs接受度的影响,我们回顾了组织公正理论和员工敬业理论,并使用它们来解释候选人对选择过程的反应。文献检索的结果表明,文化可能会影响ACs参与者如何感知达成结果或做出决策的过程的公平性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信