Judicial Uncertainty in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

Kshitij Sethi
{"title":"Judicial Uncertainty in Admissibility of Electronic Evidence","authors":"Kshitij Sethi","doi":"10.55031/mshare.2021.39.lw.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of electronic means of communications, e-commerce and the storage of information on digital servers has led to a need to modify the law relating to information technology, especially the rules of admissibility of electronic evidence, both in civil and criminal matters in India. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty and irregularity in judicial pronouncements with regard to such admissibility, especially in light of the interpretation of the provisions laid in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, on account of the amendments brought to it by the Information Technology Act, 2000. In order to point out what forms of uncertainty have been resolved by certain landmark cases and those that still exist in law, the following study mainly focusses on the requirement of a ‘certificate’ under the provisions of Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.","PeriodicalId":233824,"journal":{"name":"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MINDSHARE: International Journal of Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55031/mshare.2021.39.lw.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of electronic means of communications, e-commerce and the storage of information on digital servers has led to a need to modify the law relating to information technology, especially the rules of admissibility of electronic evidence, both in civil and criminal matters in India. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty and irregularity in judicial pronouncements with regard to such admissibility, especially in light of the interpretation of the provisions laid in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, on account of the amendments brought to it by the Information Technology Act, 2000. In order to point out what forms of uncertainty have been resolved by certain landmark cases and those that still exist in law, the following study mainly focusses on the requirement of a ‘certificate’ under the provisions of Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
电子证据可采性的司法不确定性
电子通信手段、电子商务和在数字服务器上存储信息的流行,导致有必要修改与信息技术有关的法律,特别是印度民事和刑事案件中电子证据的可采性规则。然而,关于这种可采性的司法声明仍然存在很多不确定性和不规范,特别是考虑到对1872年《印度证据法》中规定的条款的解释,因为2000年《信息技术法》对其进行了修订。为了指出某些具有里程碑意义的案件解决了哪些形式的不确定性,以及法律上仍然存在的不确定性,下面的研究主要集中在1872年印度证据法第65B(4)条规定下的“证书”要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信