Genius Learning and Think Talk Write Reviewed from Junior High School Students’ Creativity

Adi Ari Wibowo, M. Rif'at, A. Yani
{"title":"Genius Learning and Think Talk Write Reviewed from Junior High School Students’ Creativity","authors":"Adi Ari Wibowo, M. Rif'at, A. Yani","doi":"10.26418/ijli.v2i2.43373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" The study aimed to obtain information about comparing student learning outcomes, given the genius learning strategy and think talk write in terms of student creativity. The study was a quasi-experimental design and the research design was a 2x3 factorial design. The population in this study were all students of VIII grade at SMP Negeri 1 Sepauk, with a sample of VIIIC and VIIID grades who were randomly selected using cluster random sampling technique. Based on the results of data processing, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) The learning outcomes between students who were given a genius learning strategy were relatively the same as think talk write, both in general and based on the student's creativity category, (2) The learning outcomes between students who had relatively high creativity the same as students who have medium or low creativity, and students with moderate creativity have relatively the same learning outcomes as students who have low creativity both in general and in terms of learning strategies. Keywords: Creativity, Genius Learning, Think Talk Write    ","PeriodicalId":174686,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learning and Instruction (IJLI)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learning and Instruction (IJLI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/ijli.v2i2.43373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 The study aimed to obtain information about comparing student learning outcomes, given the genius learning strategy and think talk write in terms of student creativity. The study was a quasi-experimental design and the research design was a 2x3 factorial design. The population in this study were all students of VIII grade at SMP Negeri 1 Sepauk, with a sample of VIIIC and VIIID grades who were randomly selected using cluster random sampling technique. Based on the results of data processing, the following conclusions were obtained: (1) The learning outcomes between students who were given a genius learning strategy were relatively the same as think talk write, both in general and based on the student's creativity category, (2) The learning outcomes between students who had relatively high creativity the same as students who have medium or low creativity, and students with moderate creativity have relatively the same learning outcomes as students who have low creativity both in general and in terms of learning strategies. Keywords: Creativity, Genius Learning, Think Talk Write    
从初中生创造力看天才学思说写
本研究旨在从学生创造力的角度来比较天才学习策略和思考谈话写作的学生学习成果。本研究为准实验设计,研究设计为2x3因子设计。本研究的人群均为新加坡国立高等学校(SMP Negeri 1 Sepauk)的八年级学生,样本采用整群随机抽样技术随机抽取VIIIC和viid年级。根据数据处理结果,得到以下结论:(1)天才学习策略组学生的学习结果与思维、说话、写作组学生的学习结果总体上和基于学生创造力类别的学习结果基本一致;(2)创造力较高组学生的学习结果与创造力中、低组学生的学习结果基本一致,创造力中等组学生的学习结果与创造力低组学生的学习结果在总体和学习策略方面基本一致。关键词:创造力,天才学习,思谈写
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信