Comparing Univariate and Multivariate Methods for Probabilistic Industrial Load Forecasting

A. Bracale, P. De Falco, G. Carpinelli
{"title":"Comparing Univariate and Multivariate Methods for Probabilistic Industrial Load Forecasting","authors":"A. Bracale, P. De Falco, G. Carpinelli","doi":"10.1109/EFEA.2018.8617111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to their large usage of electricity, industrial factories stand out from domestic and commercial utilities for the enormous potential in providing services to power systems. Accurate energy consumption forecasts are required in order to exploit this outstanding capability, without incurring into operational mistakes. In this context, system operators prefer probabilistic load forecasts when dealing with decision-making processes, in order to fully account economical and technical risks. This paper tackles probabilistic industrial load forecasting from a dual point of view: active and reactive power forecasting. The strong correlation between active and reactive powers suggests to develop the proposed forecasting method by modeling the interaction effects between the variables; we investigate the convenience of such approach using both univariate and multivariate methods, i.e., quantile regression forests and vector autoregressive exogenous models, trained with actual data registered in an Italian factory. The results are compared to a naïve benchmark and a regression bootstrap benchmark.","PeriodicalId":447143,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th International Symposium on Environment-Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th International Symposium on Environment-Friendly Energies and Applications (EFEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EFEA.2018.8617111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Due to their large usage of electricity, industrial factories stand out from domestic and commercial utilities for the enormous potential in providing services to power systems. Accurate energy consumption forecasts are required in order to exploit this outstanding capability, without incurring into operational mistakes. In this context, system operators prefer probabilistic load forecasts when dealing with decision-making processes, in order to fully account economical and technical risks. This paper tackles probabilistic industrial load forecasting from a dual point of view: active and reactive power forecasting. The strong correlation between active and reactive powers suggests to develop the proposed forecasting method by modeling the interaction effects between the variables; we investigate the convenience of such approach using both univariate and multivariate methods, i.e., quantile regression forests and vector autoregressive exogenous models, trained with actual data registered in an Italian factory. The results are compared to a naïve benchmark and a regression bootstrap benchmark.
工业负荷概率预测的单变量和多变量方法比较
由于大量使用电力,工业工厂在为电力系统提供服务方面具有巨大的潜力,因此从家庭和商业公用事业中脱颖而出。为了利用这一杰出的能力,而不导致操作错误,需要准确的能源消耗预测。在这种情况下,系统运营商在处理决策过程时更倾向于概率负荷预测,以便充分考虑经济和技术风险。本文从有功和无功两个角度对工业负荷的概率预测进行了研究。有功功率和无功功率之间具有很强的相关性,建议通过对变量之间的相互作用进行建模来发展所提出的预测方法;我们使用单变量和多变量方法来研究这种方法的便利性,即分位数回归森林和矢量自回归外生模型,使用在意大利工厂注册的实际数据进行训练。将结果与naïve基准测试和回归引导基准测试进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信