Applicability of a Single 5 Color Cytoplasmic Markers Tube as Primary Panel in Routine Immunophenotyping of Acute Leukemia

Rahul Sharma, A. puri, D. Mutreja, Sunil Kumar, S. Sazawal, P. Mishra, R. Saxena
{"title":"Applicability of a Single 5 Color Cytoplasmic Markers Tube as Primary Panel in Routine Immunophenotyping of Acute Leukemia","authors":"Rahul Sharma, A. puri, D. Mutreja, Sunil Kumar, S. Sazawal, P. Mishra, R. Saxena","doi":"10.4172/2155-9864.1000309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Immunophenotyping in acute leukemia is a routine practice for lineage assignment. Conventionally a primary panel with surface markers are applied first followed by cytoplasmic markers as secondary panel in the diagnosis of acute leukemia.We in this present study aim to assess the relevance of a single 5 color “CD45, MPO, CD79a, CD3, Tdt” cytoplasmic markers combination to be utilized as primary panel. \nMethods: Sensitivity and specificity of different subset of positive negative combination of these markers were retrospectively analyzed in the 458 acute leukemia cases. \nResults: MPO or cCD3 positivity alongwith cCD79a negativity was 100% specific diagnosis for AML and T-ALL respectively. Furthermore, cCD79a positivity along with MPO and cCD3 negativity was 97.2% specific for B-ALL diagnosis. MPO and cCD79a dual positivity was found 100% sensitive and 92.6% specific for MPAL (B-My) diagnosis. MPO and cCD3 dual positivity was 100% sensitive and specific for MPAL (T-My) diagnosis. \nConclusion: We found a good correlation of this single tube diagnosis when compared with standard morphology, cytochemistry, and flow cytometry based diagnosis. We hope our this cytoplasmic panel may help to design a precise extended immunophenotypic panel for acute leukemia diagnosis and may also be a cost effective approach in resource constrained developing countries.","PeriodicalId":182392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Disorders and Transfusion","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Disorders and Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9864.1000309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Immunophenotyping in acute leukemia is a routine practice for lineage assignment. Conventionally a primary panel with surface markers are applied first followed by cytoplasmic markers as secondary panel in the diagnosis of acute leukemia.We in this present study aim to assess the relevance of a single 5 color “CD45, MPO, CD79a, CD3, Tdt” cytoplasmic markers combination to be utilized as primary panel. Methods: Sensitivity and specificity of different subset of positive negative combination of these markers were retrospectively analyzed in the 458 acute leukemia cases. Results: MPO or cCD3 positivity alongwith cCD79a negativity was 100% specific diagnosis for AML and T-ALL respectively. Furthermore, cCD79a positivity along with MPO and cCD3 negativity was 97.2% specific for B-ALL diagnosis. MPO and cCD79a dual positivity was found 100% sensitive and 92.6% specific for MPAL (B-My) diagnosis. MPO and cCD3 dual positivity was 100% sensitive and specific for MPAL (T-My) diagnosis. Conclusion: We found a good correlation of this single tube diagnosis when compared with standard morphology, cytochemistry, and flow cytometry based diagnosis. We hope our this cytoplasmic panel may help to design a precise extended immunophenotypic panel for acute leukemia diagnosis and may also be a cost effective approach in resource constrained developing countries.
单个5色细胞质标记管作为急性白血病常规免疫分型主要检测指标的适用性
背景:急性白血病的免疫分型是谱系分配的常规做法。在急性白血病的诊断中,通常首先应用具有表面标记的初级面板,然后应用细胞质标记作为次要面板。我们在本研究中旨在评估单个5色“CD45, MPO, CD79a, CD3, Tdt”细胞质标记组合作为主要面板的相关性。方法:回顾性分析458例急性白血病患者不同亚群阳性阴性组合的敏感性和特异性。结果:MPO或cCD3阳性与cCD79a阴性分别为AML和T-ALL的100%特异性诊断。此外,cCD79a阳性、MPO和cCD3阴性对B-ALL诊断的特异性为97.2%。MPO和cCD79a双阳性对MPAL (B-My)诊断的敏感性为100%,特异性为92.6%。MPO和cCD3双阳性对MPAL (T-My)诊断具有100%的敏感性和特异性。结论:与标准形态学、细胞化学和流式细胞术诊断相比,我们发现单管诊断具有良好的相关性。我们希望我们的细胞质小组可以帮助设计一个精确的扩展免疫表型小组,用于急性白血病的诊断,也可能是一个成本有效的方法,在资源有限的发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信