{"title":"TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP IKLAN YANG MENYESATKAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA HUKUM INTERNASIONAL TERKAIT","authors":"Christo Mario Pranda","doi":"10.25170/paradigma.v7i2.3544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesian people are consumers who tend to be consumptive. This consumptive society is used by business actors to attract a lot of consumers. One way to attract the attention of consumers is to do promotions. Promotional media can be through advertisements. With the advertisement, it is expected to be able to attract the interest of consumers to buy goods produced by business actors. In making advertisements, actors try to make advertisements as attractive as possible. it is not uncommon for business actors to make advertisements with words that have an excessive effect on consumers. Such as excessive benefits, showing what is possible, or words that turn out to be deceiving. Seeing these problems, it is important to examine how the laws and regulations in Indonesia actually regulate harmful advertising from the perspective of the Consumer Protection Law. This research is normative juridical with a statute-approach and an analytical approach. The results show that the protection of consumer rights and obligations regulated in Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK) Articles 1 to 7. The prohibition of misleading advertising business actors is regulated in UUPK Articles 9, 10, 12, 13, and 17. And the principle of accountability for business actors on misleading advertisements is regulated in Articles 19 to 28 of the UUPK.","PeriodicalId":445925,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i2.3544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Indonesian people are consumers who tend to be consumptive. This consumptive society is used by business actors to attract a lot of consumers. One way to attract the attention of consumers is to do promotions. Promotional media can be through advertisements. With the advertisement, it is expected to be able to attract the interest of consumers to buy goods produced by business actors. In making advertisements, actors try to make advertisements as attractive as possible. it is not uncommon for business actors to make advertisements with words that have an excessive effect on consumers. Such as excessive benefits, showing what is possible, or words that turn out to be deceiving. Seeing these problems, it is important to examine how the laws and regulations in Indonesia actually regulate harmful advertising from the perspective of the Consumer Protection Law. This research is normative juridical with a statute-approach and an analytical approach. The results show that the protection of consumer rights and obligations regulated in Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK) Articles 1 to 7. The prohibition of misleading advertising business actors is regulated in UUPK Articles 9, 10, 12, 13, and 17. And the principle of accountability for business actors on misleading advertisements is regulated in Articles 19 to 28 of the UUPK.
印尼人是倾向于消费的消费者。这种消费型社会被商业行为者用来吸引大量消费者。吸引消费者注意的一种方法是做促销。宣传媒介可以通过广告。有了广告,就有望吸引消费者的兴趣,购买商家生产的商品。在制作广告时,演员尽量使广告具有吸引力。商业演员用对消费者有过度影响的词语做广告并不罕见。比如过多的好处,展示什么是可能的,或者被证明是欺骗的话。看到这些问题,重要的是要从消费者保护法的角度来审视印尼的法律法规实际上是如何规范有害广告的。本研究采用规范法和分析法。结果表明,Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999年关于消费者保护(UUPK)第1至7条对消费者权利和义务的保护进行了规范。禁止误导性广告业务行为者在UUPK第9、10、12、13和17条中有规定。英国联合王国第19至28条规定了商业行为者对误导性广告的问责原则。