A Textbook Evaluation On English Textbook Entitled “Grow With English” Used By Students Of MI Nurul Huda Bengkulu City

Reko Serasi, Levina Fatimah, M. A. A. Hakim, Dian Anggraini
{"title":"A Textbook Evaluation On English Textbook Entitled “Grow With English” Used By Students Of MI Nurul Huda Bengkulu City","authors":"Reko Serasi, Levina Fatimah, M. A. A. Hakim, Dian Anggraini","doi":"10.29300/LUGHAH.V10I1.4561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the perception of the teacher and students in Madrasah Ibtidaiyyah (MI) Nurul Huda Bengkulu City when the researchers conducted an observation, the textbook is suitable for use in the teaching and learning process. Based on those perceptions, this study was intended to evaluate the quality on English textbooks Grow with English published by Erlangga Publisher used by students grade V and IV of MI Nurul Huda Bengkulu city with how much it meets the requirement of good EFL textbook considered four criteria, namely: (1) Subjects  and Contents; (2) Skills and Sub-skills; (3) Layout and Physical Make-up; and (4) Practical Consideration viewed by teacher and see students perception about these textbooks. This study used a quantitative research approach. Total population of this study were 114 students and 1 english teacher. Samples of this research were 25% of the population or 29 students which divided into 2 grades. 15 students from 5th grade and 14 students taken from 4th grade. In collecting data, researchers used checklist as the instrument which adapted from Demir and Ertas. Both textbooks was qualified based on the score ranges which divided into very bad (0-20), bad (21-40), fairly good (41-60), good (61-80), very good (81-100). The result of this study was first, Grow with English for grade five was categorized as good toward the four criteria of good EFL textbook requirements. It reached 79,78% of total score while 80,48% by students’ perception and 79,08% viewed by teachers’s perspective. Second, Grow with English for grade four was categorized  as  good  because  the  total  score  toward  the  four  criteria  is 77,77%. The total score was gained from 80,9% based on students’ perception and 74,65% viewed by teacher’s perspective. So based on the result of this study, it can concluded that both of textbooks met the criteria in fulfilling the requirements of good EFL textbook criteria covering the availability of materials based on Subjects and Contents, Skills and Sub-skills, Layout and Physical Make-up, and the Practical.","PeriodicalId":443050,"journal":{"name":"Al-Lughah: Jurnal Bahasa","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Lughah: Jurnal Bahasa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29300/LUGHAH.V10I1.4561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Based on the perception of the teacher and students in Madrasah Ibtidaiyyah (MI) Nurul Huda Bengkulu City when the researchers conducted an observation, the textbook is suitable for use in the teaching and learning process. Based on those perceptions, this study was intended to evaluate the quality on English textbooks Grow with English published by Erlangga Publisher used by students grade V and IV of MI Nurul Huda Bengkulu city with how much it meets the requirement of good EFL textbook considered four criteria, namely: (1) Subjects  and Contents; (2) Skills and Sub-skills; (3) Layout and Physical Make-up; and (4) Practical Consideration viewed by teacher and see students perception about these textbooks. This study used a quantitative research approach. Total population of this study were 114 students and 1 english teacher. Samples of this research were 25% of the population or 29 students which divided into 2 grades. 15 students from 5th grade and 14 students taken from 4th grade. In collecting data, researchers used checklist as the instrument which adapted from Demir and Ertas. Both textbooks was qualified based on the score ranges which divided into very bad (0-20), bad (21-40), fairly good (41-60), good (61-80), very good (81-100). The result of this study was first, Grow with English for grade five was categorized as good toward the four criteria of good EFL textbook requirements. It reached 79,78% of total score while 80,48% by students’ perception and 79,08% viewed by teachers’s perspective. Second, Grow with English for grade four was categorized  as  good  because  the  total  score  toward  the  four  criteria  is 77,77%. The total score was gained from 80,9% based on students’ perception and 74,65% viewed by teacher’s perspective. So based on the result of this study, it can concluded that both of textbooks met the criteria in fulfilling the requirements of good EFL textbook criteria covering the availability of materials based on Subjects and Contents, Skills and Sub-skills, Layout and Physical Make-up, and the Practical.
本古鲁市努鲁胡达校区学生使用英语教材《与英语一起成长》的教材评价
根据研究人员在班库鲁市Nurul Huda Madrasah Ibtidaiyyah (MI)师生的观感,本教材适合在教学过程中使用。基于这些认知,本研究旨在评估班库鲁市努鲁胡达中学五年级和四年级学生使用的Erlangga出版社出版的英语教材“与英语一起成长”的质量,并考虑四个标准,即:(1)科目和内容;(2)技能和子技能;(3)平面布置和物理化妆;(4)教师的实际考虑,以及学生对这些教材的看法。本研究采用了定量研究方法。研究对象为114名学生和1名英语教师。本研究的样本是人口的25%或29名学生,分为2个年级。15名五年级学生和14名四年级学生。在收集数据时,研究人员采用了清单作为工具,该工具改编自Demir和Ertas。这两本教科书都是按照非常差(0 ~ 20分)、差(21 ~ 40分)、还不错(41 ~ 60分)、好(61 ~ 80分)、很好(81 ~ 100分)的分数进行评定的。本研究的结果是,五年级的《与英语一起成长》在优秀英语教材要求的四个标准中被评为优秀。达到总分的79.78%,学生观感达到8048%,教师观感达到7908%。第二,四年级的“与英语一起成长”被评为“优秀”,因为四个标准的总分为77,77%。总得分为809%基于学生的感知,74.65%基于教师的观点。因此,根据本研究的结果,可以得出结论,这两本教材都满足了优秀英语教材标准的要求,包括以主题和内容为基础的材料的可用性,技能和子技能,布局和物理构成以及实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信