Internet Censorship in Thailand: User Practices and Potential Threats

G. Gebhart, Tadayoshi Kohno
{"title":"Internet Censorship in Thailand: User Practices and Potential Threats","authors":"G. Gebhart, Tadayoshi Kohno","doi":"10.1109/EuroSP.2017.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \"cat-and-mouse\" game of Internet censorship and circumvention cannot be won by capable technology alone. Instead, that technology must be available, comprehensible, and trustworthy to users. However, the field largely focuses only on censors and the technical means to circumvent them. Thailand, with its superlatives in Internet use and government information controls, offers a rich case study for exploring users' assessments of and interactions with censorship. We survey 229 and interview 13 Internet users in Thailand, and report on their current practices, experienced and perceived threats, and unresolved problems regarding censorship and digital security. Our findings indicate that existing circumvention tools were adequate for respondents to access blocked information, that respondents relied to some extent on risky tool selection and inaccurate assessment of blocked content, and that attempts to take action with sensitive content on social media led to the most concrete threats with the least available technical defenses. Based on these findings and in direct response to these problems, we make recommendations for shifting objectives in anti-censorship work, as well as for technical directions and future research to address users' on-the-ground needs.","PeriodicalId":233564,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2017.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The "cat-and-mouse" game of Internet censorship and circumvention cannot be won by capable technology alone. Instead, that technology must be available, comprehensible, and trustworthy to users. However, the field largely focuses only on censors and the technical means to circumvent them. Thailand, with its superlatives in Internet use and government information controls, offers a rich case study for exploring users' assessments of and interactions with censorship. We survey 229 and interview 13 Internet users in Thailand, and report on their current practices, experienced and perceived threats, and unresolved problems regarding censorship and digital security. Our findings indicate that existing circumvention tools were adequate for respondents to access blocked information, that respondents relied to some extent on risky tool selection and inaccurate assessment of blocked content, and that attempts to take action with sensitive content on social media led to the most concrete threats with the least available technical defenses. Based on these findings and in direct response to these problems, we make recommendations for shifting objectives in anti-censorship work, as well as for technical directions and future research to address users' on-the-ground needs.
泰国的网路审查:使用者行为与潜在威胁
互联网审查和规避的“猫捉老鼠”游戏,单靠技术能力是无法取胜的。相反,该技术必须是可用的、可理解的和值得用户信赖的。然而,该领域主要集中在审查和规避它们的技术手段上。泰国在互联网使用和政府信息控制方面都是最好的,为探索用户对审查制度的评估和互动提供了丰富的案例研究。我们在泰国调查了229名互联网用户,并采访了13名互联网用户,并报告了他们目前的做法,经历和感知的威胁,以及有关审查和数字安全的未解决问题。我们的研究结果表明,现有的规避工具足以让受访者访问被封锁的信息,受访者在一定程度上依赖于有风险的工具选择和对被封锁内容的不准确评估,并且试图对社交媒体上的敏感内容采取行动,导致最具体的威胁,可用的技术防御最少。基于这些发现和对这些问题的直接回应,我们对反审查工作的目标转变,以及技术方向和未来的研究提出了建议,以满足用户的实际需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信