An Evaluation of Alert Thresholds for Detect and Avoid in Terminal Operations

Michael J. Vincent, D. Jack
{"title":"An Evaluation of Alert Thresholds for Detect and Avoid in Terminal Operations","authors":"Michael J. Vincent, D. Jack","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for Detect and Avoid (DAA) Systems outline a well-clear and alerting definition for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) transitioning to and from Class A airspace or special use airspace [1]. This Phase 1 DAA well-clear (DWC) and alerting definition however, may produce losses of well clear (LoWC) and alerting undesirable to UAS operators when operating in the terminal environment, as the expectation of separation between aircraft in the terminal environment is reduced [2]. The ranges at which alerts are excited by normal terminal operations have implications on how a DAA system switches between an en-route and a terminal area DWC and alerting definition. In order to investigate this, an open loop fast time simulation study of UAS operations in a terminal environment was conducted by researchers at NASA Langley Research Center in order to investigate a terminal area DWC and alerting definition. Encounters were modeled with a UAS on a straight-in approach and traffic on various segments of a nominal visual traffic pattern to investigate the impact of integrating Detect and Avoid (DAA) for UAS into the terminal environment. The definition of well-clear was varied between the Phase 1 en-route DWC definition and a prospective terminal area DWC definition. Intruder performance, UAS performance, and flight trajectories were varied to represent a broad range of operations around an airport. Excitation of the Phase 1 MOPS alert thresholds for both the enroute and terminal area DWC were recorded through the collection of aircraft positions relative to the runway at alert threshold. Results indicate that both the terminal and en-route DWC definitions would excite early alert thresholds for aircraft on the 45° traffic pattern entry segment, indicating that the current alerting criterion would cause temporary alerts that may be undesirable to UAS operators. Late alert thresholds would also be excited for aircraft on the 45° entry segment using the en-route DWC definition defined in DO-365. Alerting for traffic on downwind was dependent on the Horizontal Miss Distance (HMD) threshold and the traffic's lateral distance from the runway centerline. These results have implications for how DAA systems will transition between the terminal area and en-route DWC.","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for Detect and Avoid (DAA) Systems outline a well-clear and alerting definition for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) transitioning to and from Class A airspace or special use airspace [1]. This Phase 1 DAA well-clear (DWC) and alerting definition however, may produce losses of well clear (LoWC) and alerting undesirable to UAS operators when operating in the terminal environment, as the expectation of separation between aircraft in the terminal environment is reduced [2]. The ranges at which alerts are excited by normal terminal operations have implications on how a DAA system switches between an en-route and a terminal area DWC and alerting definition. In order to investigate this, an open loop fast time simulation study of UAS operations in a terminal environment was conducted by researchers at NASA Langley Research Center in order to investigate a terminal area DWC and alerting definition. Encounters were modeled with a UAS on a straight-in approach and traffic on various segments of a nominal visual traffic pattern to investigate the impact of integrating Detect and Avoid (DAA) for UAS into the terminal environment. The definition of well-clear was varied between the Phase 1 en-route DWC definition and a prospective terminal area DWC definition. Intruder performance, UAS performance, and flight trajectories were varied to represent a broad range of operations around an airport. Excitation of the Phase 1 MOPS alert thresholds for both the enroute and terminal area DWC were recorded through the collection of aircraft positions relative to the runway at alert threshold. Results indicate that both the terminal and en-route DWC definitions would excite early alert thresholds for aircraft on the 45° traffic pattern entry segment, indicating that the current alerting criterion would cause temporary alerts that may be undesirable to UAS operators. Late alert thresholds would also be excited for aircraft on the 45° entry segment using the en-route DWC definition defined in DO-365. Alerting for traffic on downwind was dependent on the Horizontal Miss Distance (HMD) threshold and the traffic's lateral distance from the runway centerline. These results have implications for how DAA systems will transition between the terminal area and en-route DWC.
终端操作中检测与规避预警阈值的评估
探测和躲避(DAA)系统的最低操作性能标准(MOPS)概述了无人机系统(UAS)从a类空域或特殊用途空域过渡到[1]的清晰和警报定义。然而,第一阶段DAA清井(DWC)和警报定义可能会产生清井损失(LoWC)和警报,这对终端环境中的无人机操作员来说是不希望的,因为终端环境中飞机之间的间隔预期减少了100倍。正常终端操作触发警报的范围会影响DAA系统如何在途中和终端区DWC和警报定义之间切换。为了研究这一点,NASA兰利研究中心的研究人员对终端环境中的UAS操作进行了开环快时间模拟研究,以研究终端区域DWC和警报定义。采用垂直进近的UAS和标称视觉交通模式的不同路段的交通进行碰撞建模,以研究将UAS的检测和避免(DAA)集成到终端环境中的影响。在第一阶段的途中DWC定义和未来的终端区域DWC定义之间,清井的定义有所不同。入侵者性能、无人机性能和飞行轨迹变化,以代表机场周围的广泛操作。通过收集在警戒阈值处相对于跑道的飞机位置,记录航路和终端区DWC的第一阶段MOPS警戒阈值的激发。结果表明,终端和航路DWC定义都会激发45°交通模式进入段的飞机的早期警报阈值,这表明当前的警报标准会导致临时警报,这可能是UAS运营商不希望看到的。使用DO-365中定义的航路DWC定义,也将为45°进入段的飞机激发延迟警报阈值。顺风方向的飞机警报依赖于水平脱靶距离(HMD)阈值和飞机离跑道中心线的横向距离。这些结果对DAA系统如何在终端区和航路DWC之间转换具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信