Effectiveness of Basic Life-Support Programme and Public Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Training Event Among Medical Students: A Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study

M. Htay, Yashodhara Byagoti Math, H. Soe, K. Dubey, S. B. Ibrahim, Venkatesan Vijaya Poornima, Aung Win Thein, A. Winn, Sook Vui Chong, R. Gupta, P. Venkatesan, K. Zaw, H. Lwin, A. Abas, S. Moe
{"title":"Effectiveness of Basic Life-Support Programme and Public Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Training Event Among Medical Students: A Pilot Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"M. Htay, Yashodhara Byagoti Math, H. Soe, K. Dubey, S. B. Ibrahim, Venkatesan Vijaya Poornima, Aung Win Thein, A. Winn, Sook Vui Chong, R. Gupta, P. Venkatesan, K. Zaw, H. Lwin, A. Abas, S. Moe","doi":"10.21315/eimj2023.15.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immediate resuscitation is crucial for the survival of a patient with cardiac arrest. Research has suggested that self-led bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is significantly associated with favourable neurological outcomes for patients. Furthermore, medical students play an important role in providing public CPR training to the community. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a CPR training programmes and a public training event on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceived competency towards CPR among medical students. The quasi-experimental study was conducted among the medical students in clinical years studying at a private medical institution in Malaysia. The intervention group received CPR training for two sessions and participated as trainers in a community-training event; the control group was excluded from these activities. A total of 106 students (intervention group, n = 51; control group, n = 55) participated in this study. The total knowledge score (5.24 ± 1.67 vs 3.75 ± 1.22, P < 0.001), attitude score (22.38 ± 3.67 vs 20.82 ± 2.33, P = 0.011), and perceived competencies to perform CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) (7.22 ± 2.33 vs 4.93 ± 2.40, P < 0.001) were significantly higher among the participants in the intervention group compared to those in the control group after the intervention. Meanwhile, concerns regarding initiating CPR was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (12.44 ± 5.15 vs 9.55 ± 3.96, P = 0.002). The results suggested that CPR training is beneficial for students and should be organised regularly. In addition to providing physical skills training, such sessions should explain legal implications of initiating CPR and should encourage and assure students to do so in case of an emergency.","PeriodicalId":130340,"journal":{"name":"Education in Medicine Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2023.15.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Immediate resuscitation is crucial for the survival of a patient with cardiac arrest. Research has suggested that self-led bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is significantly associated with favourable neurological outcomes for patients. Furthermore, medical students play an important role in providing public CPR training to the community. This study aims to evaluate the effects of a CPR training programmes and a public training event on the knowledge, attitudes, and perceived competency towards CPR among medical students. The quasi-experimental study was conducted among the medical students in clinical years studying at a private medical institution in Malaysia. The intervention group received CPR training for two sessions and participated as trainers in a community-training event; the control group was excluded from these activities. A total of 106 students (intervention group, n = 51; control group, n = 55) participated in this study. The total knowledge score (5.24 ± 1.67 vs 3.75 ± 1.22, P < 0.001), attitude score (22.38 ± 3.67 vs 20.82 ± 2.33, P = 0.011), and perceived competencies to perform CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) (7.22 ± 2.33 vs 4.93 ± 2.40, P < 0.001) were significantly higher among the participants in the intervention group compared to those in the control group after the intervention. Meanwhile, concerns regarding initiating CPR was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (12.44 ± 5.15 vs 9.55 ± 3.96, P = 0.002). The results suggested that CPR training is beneficial for students and should be organised regularly. In addition to providing physical skills training, such sessions should explain legal implications of initiating CPR and should encourage and assure students to do so in case of an emergency.
医学生基本生命支持计划和公共心肺复苏训练活动的有效性:一项试点准实验研究
立即复苏对心脏骤停患者的生存至关重要。研究表明,自我引导的旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)与患者良好的神经系统预后显著相关。此外,医学生在向社区提供公共心肺复苏术培训方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在评估一项心肺复苏术培训计划和一项公开培训活动对医学生心肺复苏术知识、态度和感知能力的影响。准实验研究是在马来西亚一家私立医疗机构的临床年级医学生中进行的。干预组接受两次心肺复苏术培训,并作为培训师参加社区培训活动;对照组被排除在这些活动之外。干预组共106名学生(n = 51;对照组(n = 55)参加本研究。干预组的总知识得分(5.24±1.67 vs 3.75±1.22,P < 0.001)、态度得分(22.38±3.67 vs 20.82±2.33,P = 0.011)、实施心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器(AED)的感知能力(7.22±2.33 vs 4.93±2.40,P < 0.001)均显著高于对照组。与此同时,干预组对启动心肺复苏术的担忧程度明显高于对照组(12.44±5.15 vs 9.55±3.96,P = 0.002)。结果表明,心肺复苏术训练对学生有益,应定期组织。除了提供身体技能培训外,此类课程还应解释启动心肺复苏术的法律影响,并应鼓励和确保学生在紧急情况下这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信