MONITORING OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION QUALITY: DIAGNOSTIC AND COMPETENCY SCIENTIFIC POSITION

L. Hritsenko, L. Lysenko
{"title":"MONITORING OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION QUALITY: DIAGNOSTIC AND COMPETENCY SCIENTIFIC POSITION","authors":"L. Hritsenko, L. Lysenko","doi":"10.33989/2519-8254.2020.7.238052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article clarifies the scientific basis of monitoring the quality of education on the basis of diagnostic and competence understanding of the possibilities of systematic research of this process in general secondary education institutions. The analysis of sources and publications made it possible to identify the importance of the problem of monitoring the quality of education for the theory of management of general secondary and higher education, considering this category as political, managerial, pedagogical. Clarification of the leading characteristics of the quality of education (multifaceted, multilevel end results, polychronicity, multi-subjectivity, multi-criteria, uncertainty in assessments, invariance and variability) in the works of Ukrainian and foreign authors led to the goal - outlining in research the scientific basis of quality monitoring on the basis of diagnostic-competence understanding of the possibilities of systematic research of this process in the institutions of general secondary school. The functions of monitoring the quality of education are characterized: activating, informational, corrective, formative, diagnostic and analytical, modeling and management, prognostic; the algorithm of their realization offered by T. Lukina and A. Belkin is chosen. The diagnostic and competence specifics of control methods in the system of quality monitoring of general secondary education are determined. One of the management tools and elements of the system is defined as quality monitoring, which is recommended to be understood as “supervision, tracking, observation; testing or measurement at specified time intervals to control and regulate processes ”has the status of a study rather than an empirical collection of material, and is complex, systemic in nature. The conclusion on specificity of quality control of education which provides: check - revealing of a condition of formation of components of competence is carried out; assessment - measurement and conditional reflection of this condition in the form of a level of quantitative or qualitative assessment; accounting - recording results in the form of summary tables. It is recommended to reflect the process of education quality assessment in a certain scale, which systematically takes into account the data obtained during the current assessment, testing, performance of tests and practical tasks, exams, ranking, etc.","PeriodicalId":130848,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian professional education","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian professional education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33989/2519-8254.2020.7.238052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article clarifies the scientific basis of monitoring the quality of education on the basis of diagnostic and competence understanding of the possibilities of systematic research of this process in general secondary education institutions. The analysis of sources and publications made it possible to identify the importance of the problem of monitoring the quality of education for the theory of management of general secondary and higher education, considering this category as political, managerial, pedagogical. Clarification of the leading characteristics of the quality of education (multifaceted, multilevel end results, polychronicity, multi-subjectivity, multi-criteria, uncertainty in assessments, invariance and variability) in the works of Ukrainian and foreign authors led to the goal - outlining in research the scientific basis of quality monitoring on the basis of diagnostic-competence understanding of the possibilities of systematic research of this process in the institutions of general secondary school. The functions of monitoring the quality of education are characterized: activating, informational, corrective, formative, diagnostic and analytical, modeling and management, prognostic; the algorithm of their realization offered by T. Lukina and A. Belkin is chosen. The diagnostic and competence specifics of control methods in the system of quality monitoring of general secondary education are determined. One of the management tools and elements of the system is defined as quality monitoring, which is recommended to be understood as “supervision, tracking, observation; testing or measurement at specified time intervals to control and regulate processes ”has the status of a study rather than an empirical collection of material, and is complex, systemic in nature. The conclusion on specificity of quality control of education which provides: check - revealing of a condition of formation of components of competence is carried out; assessment - measurement and conditional reflection of this condition in the form of a level of quantitative or qualitative assessment; accounting - recording results in the form of summary tables. It is recommended to reflect the process of education quality assessment in a certain scale, which systematically takes into account the data obtained during the current assessment, testing, performance of tests and practical tasks, exams, ranking, etc.
普通中等教育质量监测:诊断与胜任的科学定位
本文在对普通中等教育机构教育质量监控过程进行系统研究的可能性的诊断性和胜任性认识的基础上,阐明了教育质量监控的科学依据。对资料来源和出版物的分析使人们能够确定监测教育质量问题对一般中等和高等教育管理理论的重要性,并将这一类别视为政治、管理和教学。澄清教育质量的主要特征(多面性、多层次的最终结果、多时代性、多主观性、多标准、评估的不确定性、乌克兰和外国作者的作品中的不变性和可变性导致了目标-在对普通中学机构系统研究这一过程的可能性的诊断能力理解的基础上概述研究质量监测的科学基础。教育质量监测的功能特点是:激活、信息、纠正、形成、诊断和分析、建模和管理、预测;本文选择T. Lukina和A. Belkin提供的实现算法。确定了普通中等教育质量监测系统中控制方法的诊断和能力特点。该体系的管理工具和要素之一被定义为质量监控,建议理解为“监督、跟踪、观察;在规定的时间间隔内进行测试或测量,以控制和调节过程,具有研究的地位,而不是材料的经验收集,并且本质上是复杂的,系统性的。对教育质量控制的特殊性进行了总结:对素质要素的形成条件进行了检查揭示;评估——以定量或定性评估的形式衡量和有条件地反映这种状况;会计——以汇总表的形式记录结果。建议以一定的尺度反映教育质量评估的过程,系统地考虑到当前评估、测试、测试表现和实际任务、考试、排名等过程中获得的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信