The use of anatomical models in an Orthopaedic clinic aids in patient education

B. Tan, E. Pagkaliwagan, R. Socklingam, Sbm Darshana Chandrakumara, Charles Kon Kam King
{"title":"The use of anatomical models in an Orthopaedic clinic aids in patient education","authors":"B. Tan, E. Pagkaliwagan, R. Socklingam, Sbm Darshana Chandrakumara, Charles Kon Kam King","doi":"10.37515/ortho.8231.4304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the World Health Organisation strategies to achieve patient centered care is for patients to be able to effectively give informed consent. Well-informed patients are also likely to be more compliant and have better treatment outcomes. Aims and Objectives: Our study looks at using anatomical models as adjuncts in consultations to determine if they would be useful in improving patient understanding and satisfaction. Study Design/Methods: A survey of patients was carried out at a single Orthopaedic foot and ankle clinic in Singapore, to investigate if patients felt that the use of anatomical models aided in their understanding of their medical condition, foot and ankle anatomy, and surgical procedures offered, if any. 2 different anatomical models were used, depending on the context of the consultation. All conditions encountered were included. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this study. Results: 30 patients were surveyed in total, all of whom agreed that the models were useful in helping them understand their medical condition and foot and ankle anatomy better. Of the 19 patients who were counselled regarding surgery, 18 felt that the models improved their understanding of the proposed procedures. 26 patients would like similar models to be used in other Orthopaedic clinics, although 3 would not, and 1 was not sure. On the whole, 19 patients found the models very useful, and 11 patients found them useful. Conclusion: Anatomical models are a cost-effective method of contributing to patient education compared to other alternatives, and we would advocate the use of models in other Orthopaedic clinics during consultations for counselling and taking informed consent.","PeriodicalId":252930,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.4304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the World Health Organisation strategies to achieve patient centered care is for patients to be able to effectively give informed consent. Well-informed patients are also likely to be more compliant and have better treatment outcomes. Aims and Objectives: Our study looks at using anatomical models as adjuncts in consultations to determine if they would be useful in improving patient understanding and satisfaction. Study Design/Methods: A survey of patients was carried out at a single Orthopaedic foot and ankle clinic in Singapore, to investigate if patients felt that the use of anatomical models aided in their understanding of their medical condition, foot and ankle anatomy, and surgical procedures offered, if any. 2 different anatomical models were used, depending on the context of the consultation. All conditions encountered were included. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this study. Results: 30 patients were surveyed in total, all of whom agreed that the models were useful in helping them understand their medical condition and foot and ankle anatomy better. Of the 19 patients who were counselled regarding surgery, 18 felt that the models improved their understanding of the proposed procedures. 26 patients would like similar models to be used in other Orthopaedic clinics, although 3 would not, and 1 was not sure. On the whole, 19 patients found the models very useful, and 11 patients found them useful. Conclusion: Anatomical models are a cost-effective method of contributing to patient education compared to other alternatives, and we would advocate the use of models in other Orthopaedic clinics during consultations for counselling and taking informed consent.
在骨科诊所中使用解剖模型有助于对患者进行教育
背景:世界卫生组织实现以患者为中心的护理的战略之一是患者能够有效地给予知情同意。消息灵通的患者也可能更顺从,并有更好的治疗结果。目的和目的:我们的研究着眼于在会诊中使用解剖学模型作为辅助手段,以确定它们是否有助于提高患者的理解和满意度。研究设计/方法:在新加坡的一家骨科足和踝关节诊所对患者进行调查,以调查患者是否认为使用解剖模型有助于他们了解自己的医疗状况、足和踝关节解剖以及所提供的手术程序(如果有的话)。根据会诊的情况,使用了2种不同的解剖模型。所有遇到的情况都包括在内。本研究不需要机构审查委员会的批准。结果:共调查了30例患者,所有患者都同意模型有助于他们更好地了解自己的医疗状况和足部和踝关节解剖结构。在接受手术咨询的19名患者中,18名患者认为这些模型提高了他们对拟议手术的理解。26名患者希望在其他骨科诊所使用类似的模型,3名不希望,1名不确定。总体而言,19名患者认为模型非常有用,11名患者认为模型有用。结论:与其他替代方法相比,解剖模型是一种具有成本效益的促进患者教育的方法,我们建议在其他骨科诊所进行咨询和知情同意时使用模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信