15 Structures and Dynamics of the Early Imperial Chinese Economy

Kathrin Leese-Messing
{"title":"15 Structures and Dynamics of the Early Imperial Chinese Economy","authors":"Kathrin Leese-Messing","doi":"10.1515/9783110607642-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to broadly situate the early imperial economy within the course of Chinese economic history and in relation to economies of other regions, a couple of its defining features may be introduced as a start. The early imperial economy was, like that of the preceding Warring States period, a largely agrarian economy. Nevertheless, it developed several new features that distinguished it from its predecessors. With its increasing monetization of the fiscal system, the legalization of private land purchases, and the extension of wage labor markets, it featured what economic historians commonly point to as fundamental stimuli for market exchange. Accordingly, symptoms of growing private markets can be easily discerned in different kinds of Han sources. However, and unsurprisingly, the early imperial era was also determined by some fundamental features that characterized all ancient economies.1 Above all, the absence of modern transport and information facilities put extensive transregional integration of markets out of reach. In early imperial China, scarcity of large-scale private trading organizations may be seen as a further factor in favor of localized or regionalized supply structures. Yet state institutions, acting on an expressed awareness of supply and demand imbalances from an imperial perspective, stepped in both as producers and distributors, often on a massive and longdistance scale. How effective these state involvements were, and what broader, long-term economic consequences resulted from them, is still a matter of debate and ongoing research.","PeriodicalId":128613,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607642-023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to broadly situate the early imperial economy within the course of Chinese economic history and in relation to economies of other regions, a couple of its defining features may be introduced as a start. The early imperial economy was, like that of the preceding Warring States period, a largely agrarian economy. Nevertheless, it developed several new features that distinguished it from its predecessors. With its increasing monetization of the fiscal system, the legalization of private land purchases, and the extension of wage labor markets, it featured what economic historians commonly point to as fundamental stimuli for market exchange. Accordingly, symptoms of growing private markets can be easily discerned in different kinds of Han sources. However, and unsurprisingly, the early imperial era was also determined by some fundamental features that characterized all ancient economies.1 Above all, the absence of modern transport and information facilities put extensive transregional integration of markets out of reach. In early imperial China, scarcity of large-scale private trading organizations may be seen as a further factor in favor of localized or regionalized supply structures. Yet state institutions, acting on an expressed awareness of supply and demand imbalances from an imperial perspective, stepped in both as producers and distributors, often on a massive and longdistance scale. How effective these state involvements were, and what broader, long-term economic consequences resulted from them, is still a matter of debate and ongoing research.
15帝国早期中国经济的结构与动态
为了在中国经济史的进程中以及与其他地区经济的关系中更广泛地定位早期帝国经济,它的几个决定性特征可以作为一个开始。早期的帝国经济,就像之前的战国时期一样,主要是农业经济。尽管如此,它还是开发了几个新功能,使其区别于它的前辈。随着财政系统货币化程度的提高,私人土地购买的合法化,以及工资劳动力市场的扩大,它的特点是经济历史学家通常指出的对市场交换的基本刺激。因此,在不同种类的汉文资料中,可以很容易地看出民间市场发展的征兆。然而,毫不奇怪的是,早期帝国时代也是由所有古代经济的一些基本特征决定的最重要的是,现代运输和信息设施的缺乏使广泛的跨区域市场一体化遥不可及。在帝制早期的中国,大规模私人贸易组织的稀缺可能被视为有利于本地化或区域化供应结构的进一步因素。然而,从帝国的角度出发,国家机构明确意识到供需失衡,它们以生产者和分销商的身份介入,而且往往规模庞大、距离遥远。这些国家干预的效果如何,以及由此产生的更广泛、长期的经济后果,仍然是一个有争议和正在进行的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信