Layered cobalt and nickel oxide cathodes: a comparison of their structural and chemical stabilities

A. Manthiram, R. Chebiam, F. Prado
{"title":"Layered cobalt and nickel oxide cathodes: a comparison of their structural and chemical stabilities","authors":"A. Manthiram, R. Chebiam, F. Prado","doi":"10.1109/BCAA.2001.905137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Layered LiNi/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/ cathodes have drawn much attention recently due to its higher capacity compared to the currently used layered LiCoO/sub 2/ cathode. However, the structural and chemical stabilities of the LiNi/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/ cathodes during long-term cycling in lithium-ion cells have not been fully assessed. From a systematic investigation, the structural and chemical stabilities of the two systems are compared. Wet-chemical analysis of chemically delithiated Li/sub 1-x/CoO/sub 2/ and Li/sub 1-x/Ni/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/ establish that the former system tends to lose oxygen from the lattice for (1-x)<0.5, which limits its capacity to 140 mAh/g, while the latter system does not suffer from oxygen loss at least for 0.3/spl les/(1-x)/spl les/1. However, the nickel oxide system suffers from structural instability under mild heat (T>50/spl deg/C) due to a migration of Ni/sup 3+/ ions from the nickel layer to the lithium layer. The differences in the structural and chemical stabilities between the two systems are explained based on crystal field stabilization energies and the relative positions of metal:3d and O:2p bands.","PeriodicalId":360008,"journal":{"name":"Sixteenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances. Proceedings of the Conference (Cat. No.01TH8533)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixteenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances. Proceedings of the Conference (Cat. No.01TH8533)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BCAA.2001.905137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Layered LiNi/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/ cathodes have drawn much attention recently due to its higher capacity compared to the currently used layered LiCoO/sub 2/ cathode. However, the structural and chemical stabilities of the LiNi/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/ cathodes during long-term cycling in lithium-ion cells have not been fully assessed. From a systematic investigation, the structural and chemical stabilities of the two systems are compared. Wet-chemical analysis of chemically delithiated Li/sub 1-x/CoO/sub 2/ and Li/sub 1-x/Ni/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/ establish that the former system tends to lose oxygen from the lattice for (1-x)<0.5, which limits its capacity to 140 mAh/g, while the latter system does not suffer from oxygen loss at least for 0.3/spl les/(1-x)/spl les/1. However, the nickel oxide system suffers from structural instability under mild heat (T>50/spl deg/C) due to a migration of Ni/sup 3+/ ions from the nickel layer to the lithium layer. The differences in the structural and chemical stabilities between the two systems are explained based on crystal field stabilization energies and the relative positions of metal:3d and O:2p bands.
层状钴和镍氧化物阴极:结构和化学稳定性的比较
与目前使用的层状LiCoO/sub 2/阴极相比,层状LiNi/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/阴极具有更高的容量,近年来备受关注。然而,锂离子电池长期循环过程中LiNi/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub 2/阴极的结构和化学稳定性尚未得到充分评估。通过系统的考察,比较了两种体系的结构稳定性和化学稳定性。对Li/sub - 1-x/CoO/sub - 2/和Li/sub - 1-x/Ni/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub - 2/的湿化学分析表明,由于Ni/sup +/离子从镍层迁移到锂层,Li/sub - 1-x/Ni/sub 0.85/Co/sub 0.15/O/sub - 2/在(1-x)50/spl℃范围内,前者体系容易从晶格中失去氧。根据晶体场稳定能和金属:3d和O:2p波段的相对位置,解释了两种体系在结构和化学稳定性上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信