LANGUAGE PARADIGM IN THE NOVELS OF L. TOLSTOY 80-ies – 90-ies of the 19th CENTURY

O. Y. Dobrobabina
{"title":"LANGUAGE PARADIGM IN THE NOVELS OF L. TOLSTOY 80-ies – 90-ies of the 19th CENTURY","authors":"O. Y. Dobrobabina","doi":"10.18524/2307-8332.2021.1(23).251877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the forms and types of speech: \"monologic\", \"dialogical\". The specificity of the organization of \"speech forms\" is investigated. Attention is paid to architectonics and the proportional relationship of various \"speech forms\". The focus is on the stories of L. M. Tolstoy of the late period of his work. The main functions of direct speech in these works are revealed: the definition of character traits of the hero, his retinue, the era to which he belongs. We are also talking about the connection between the linguistic and plot levels of L. M. Tolstoy's stories, any of which is an artistic system and a separate artistic world. The linguistic organization of Tolstoy's stories is investigated, namely, the connections between individual parts of the text, paragraphs. Attention is drawn to the place of dialogical, as well as disordered language in the stories. The role of internal monologues has been studied (reflection of the process of reflection of heroes, the struggle of different motives of behavior, the doubling of consciousness, etc). The author of the article substantiates the conclusion that L. Tolstoy turned logical inner speech into a special, powerful means of analysis with immediate reliability: a person analyzes himself using dismembered formulations. The article also examines the relationship between the \"speech\" and \"plot\" structures of the work of L. Tolstoy.","PeriodicalId":113251,"journal":{"name":"Odessa National University Herald. Series: Philology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odessa National University Herald. Series: Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-8332.2021.1(23).251877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the forms and types of speech: "monologic", "dialogical". The specificity of the organization of "speech forms" is investigated. Attention is paid to architectonics and the proportional relationship of various "speech forms". The focus is on the stories of L. M. Tolstoy of the late period of his work. The main functions of direct speech in these works are revealed: the definition of character traits of the hero, his retinue, the era to which he belongs. We are also talking about the connection between the linguistic and plot levels of L. M. Tolstoy's stories, any of which is an artistic system and a separate artistic world. The linguistic organization of Tolstoy's stories is investigated, namely, the connections between individual parts of the text, paragraphs. Attention is drawn to the place of dialogical, as well as disordered language in the stories. The role of internal monologues has been studied (reflection of the process of reflection of heroes, the struggle of different motives of behavior, the doubling of consciousness, etc). The author of the article substantiates the conclusion that L. Tolstoy turned logical inner speech into a special, powerful means of analysis with immediate reliability: a person analyzes himself using dismembered formulations. The article also examines the relationship between the "speech" and "plot" structures of the work of L. Tolstoy.
19世纪80- 90年代托尔斯泰小说中的语言范式
文章分析了语言的形式和类型:“独白式”、“对话式”。研究了“言语形式”组织的特殊性。注重建筑和各种“言语形式”的比例关系。重点是l·m·托尔斯泰作品后期的故事。揭示了直接引语在这些作品中的主要功能:对主人公性格特征的界定,对其随从的界定,对其所处时代的界定。我们还讨论了托尔斯泰小说的语言和情节层面之间的联系,其中任何一个层面都是一个艺术体系和一个独立的艺术世界。本文研究了托尔斯泰小说的语言组织,即文本各部分、段落之间的联系。注意对话的地方,以及无序的语言在故事中。研究了内心独白的作用(对英雄反思过程的反思、不同行为动机的斗争、意识的双重化等)。这篇文章的作者证实了托尔斯泰将逻辑的内心话语变成了一种特殊的、强大的、具有直接可靠性的分析手段的结论:一个人用肢解的公式来分析自己。本文还考察了托尔斯泰作品中“言语”结构与“情节”结构之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信