Cultural Warrant: Old and New Sights from Knowledge Organization

Mario Barité, Mirtha Rauch
{"title":"Cultural Warrant: Old and New Sights from Knowledge Organization","authors":"Mario Barité, Mirtha Rauch","doi":"10.5771/9783956507762-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Culture is a controversial and multi-discursive term in different disciplines. A dimension of Knowledge Organi- zation (KO) appears in the cultural warrant (CW) because KO systems, processes and products show “the values of the cultures involved” (Guimarães et al. 2019). We identified four theoretical elements necessary to understand the CW: the need of adjusting the concept of culture to the KO field; the focus placed on local dimen- sions of knowledge; the intention to promote biased classifications in favour of minority and relegated social sectors; and the ethical issue expressed in the respect for the integrity of the cultural thought of a community. The suitable techniques for the application of the CW in the processes of construction, evaluation, and revision of knowledge organization systems (KOS) are qualitative. Some methods are common to KO: content, terminological, discourse, and domain analysis techniques. We also propose a categorization of three cultural hos-pitalities. It is concluded that the concepts of culture and CW are not neutral since they favour forms of knowledge organization that replace the criteria of objectivity and neutrality, by those of cultural pertinence and respect for the values of a community. We also suggest considering the extrapolation of some methodologies from social sciences to study the linguistic behaviour of subcultures in order to improve the CW of KOS.","PeriodicalId":314959,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Organization at the Interface","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Organization at the Interface","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956507762-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Culture is a controversial and multi-discursive term in different disciplines. A dimension of Knowledge Organi- zation (KO) appears in the cultural warrant (CW) because KO systems, processes and products show “the values of the cultures involved” (Guimarães et al. 2019). We identified four theoretical elements necessary to understand the CW: the need of adjusting the concept of culture to the KO field; the focus placed on local dimen- sions of knowledge; the intention to promote biased classifications in favour of minority and relegated social sectors; and the ethical issue expressed in the respect for the integrity of the cultural thought of a community. The suitable techniques for the application of the CW in the processes of construction, evaluation, and revision of knowledge organization systems (KOS) are qualitative. Some methods are common to KO: content, terminological, discourse, and domain analysis techniques. We also propose a categorization of three cultural hos-pitalities. It is concluded that the concepts of culture and CW are not neutral since they favour forms of knowledge organization that replace the criteria of objectivity and neutrality, by those of cultural pertinence and respect for the values of a community. We also suggest considering the extrapolation of some methodologies from social sciences to study the linguistic behaviour of subcultures in order to improve the CW of KOS.
文化担保书:知识组织的新旧视角
:在不同学科中,文化是一个具有争议性和多义性的术语。知识组织(KO)的一个维度出现在文化权证(CW)中,因为知识组织系统、流程和产品展示了 "相关文化的价值观"(Guimarães 等人,2019 年)。我们确定了理解 CW 所需的四个理论要素:根据 KO 领域调整文化概念的必要性;关注知识的地方维度;促进偏向于少数群体和被降级的社会部门的分类意图;以及尊重社区文化思想完整性所体现的伦理问题。在构建、评估和修订知识组织系统(KOS)的过程中,适用于应用 CW 的技术是定性的。有些方法是知识组织系统常用的:内容、术语、话语和领域分析技术。我们还提出了三种文化资本的分类。结论是,文化和 CW 的概念并不是中性的,因为它们有利于以文化相关性和尊重社区价值观的标准取代客观性和中立性标准的知识组织形式。我们还建议考虑将社会科学中的一些方法推而广之,用于研究亚文化的语言行为,以改进知识管理系统的语用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信