How can Clinical Research Trials Conducted in Developing Countries Minimize Exploitation?

G. Mukherjee
{"title":"How can Clinical Research Trials Conducted in Developing Countries Minimize Exploitation?","authors":"G. Mukherjee","doi":"10.23880/abca-16000191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Western scholars, pharmaceutical companies, and academic institutions are and have been conducting research in developing countries for many years. These locations boast substantial cost savings, expedited timelines, and little to no regulatory oversight, making them attractive to developed-world researchers. Residents of these communities are impoverished, often illiterate, unemployed, and with untreated health conditions. Because established ethical protocols for international research are often compromised or misconstrued by researchers and/or their sponsors, these individuals are left vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. In this paper, I explore how current utilization of ethical guidelines is enabling exploitation. I identify ethical questions regarding subject recruitment, informed consent, standard of care, and the post-trial obligations of researchers. I then examine specific situations in which exploitation occurred because of drug, vaccine, or clinical trials. I conclude by offering recommendations to create a more streamlined approach to international research that takes into account the experiences and needs of vulnerable populations. This approach helps ensure that participants are fully involved in the ethical approval process; able to choose whether or not to participate without any undue influence or pressure; treated with the standard of care best suited to their context and surroundings; and reasonably given access to any interventions proven effective during the course of the trial.. A respect for beneficence, justice, and self-autonomy should guide researchers’ interactions with subjects before, during, and after the trial.","PeriodicalId":419562,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/abca-16000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Western scholars, pharmaceutical companies, and academic institutions are and have been conducting research in developing countries for many years. These locations boast substantial cost savings, expedited timelines, and little to no regulatory oversight, making them attractive to developed-world researchers. Residents of these communities are impoverished, often illiterate, unemployed, and with untreated health conditions. Because established ethical protocols for international research are often compromised or misconstrued by researchers and/or their sponsors, these individuals are left vulnerable to exploitation and abuse. In this paper, I explore how current utilization of ethical guidelines is enabling exploitation. I identify ethical questions regarding subject recruitment, informed consent, standard of care, and the post-trial obligations of researchers. I then examine specific situations in which exploitation occurred because of drug, vaccine, or clinical trials. I conclude by offering recommendations to create a more streamlined approach to international research that takes into account the experiences and needs of vulnerable populations. This approach helps ensure that participants are fully involved in the ethical approval process; able to choose whether or not to participate without any undue influence or pressure; treated with the standard of care best suited to their context and surroundings; and reasonably given access to any interventions proven effective during the course of the trial.. A respect for beneficence, justice, and self-autonomy should guide researchers’ interactions with subjects before, during, and after the trial.
在发展中国家进行的临床研究试验如何使剥削最小化?
多年来,西方学者、制药公司和学术机构一直在发展中国家开展研究。这些地点拥有大量的成本节约、快速的时间表和很少甚至没有监管监督,这使它们对发达国家的研究人员具有吸引力。这些社区的居民贫穷,往往不识字,没有工作,健康状况得不到治疗。由于国际研究的既定伦理协议经常被研究人员和/或其赞助者破坏或误解,这些人很容易受到剥削和虐待。在本文中,我探讨了当前对道德准则的利用如何使剥削成为可能。我确定了有关受试者招募、知情同意、护理标准和研究人员试验后义务的伦理问题。然后,我考察了由于药物、疫苗或临床试验而发生剥削的具体情况。最后,我提出了一些建议,以建立一种考虑到弱势群体的经验和需求的更精简的国际研究方法。这种方法有助于确保参与者充分参与伦理审批过程;能够在不受任何不当影响或压力的情况下选择是否参加;以最适合其背景和环境的护理标准对待;在试验过程中合理地给予有效的干预措施在试验之前、期间和之后,研究人员与受试者的互动应该遵循对仁慈、正义和自主的尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信