Clinical and statistical retrospective analysis of the anamnesis of patients with peritoneal pelvic adhesions

P.F. Shaganov
{"title":"Clinical and statistical retrospective analysis of the anamnesis of patients with peritoneal pelvic adhesions","authors":"P.F. Shaganov","doi":"10.52705/2788-6190-2021-3-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective: to identify risk factors for the formation of peritoneal adhesions in women of reproductive age.\nMaterials and methods. A retrospective analysis of histories of 187 women who were operated by laparoscopic access and diagnosis of peritoneal adhesions was carried out as the main or concomitant. Data on somatic, reproductive and gynecological history, age and social status were assessed. The comparison group consisted of 65 women in which peritoneal adhesions were not detected during surgery.\nResults. Analysis of the somatic history of women with and without adhesions in the abdominal cavity showed that women with adhesions had 3.2 (14.97% compared with 4.62%; p <0.05) times more often one or another type of allergy, and 3.5 times more often (10.70% and 3.07% respectively) had autoimmune diseases. Surgical interventions in the past were recorded in both groups, although their number was almost 6 times greater in patients with peritoneal adhesions (53.48% compared to 9.23%; p<0.05). In\nwomen with adhesions in the abdominal cavity, the percentage of operations on the pelvic organs was 2.5 times higher (85.00% compared to 33.33%; p<0.05), and only in this category of patients abdominal drainage was performed during surgery (22.4%; p<0.05). The study of gynecological morbidity in the examined women showed that patients with abdominal adhesions had 3.6 times more often inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs (61.50% compared to 16.92%; p<0.05), and every third had more than one episode of this pathology in history (33.68%; p<0.05). In addition, every fifth woman with adhesions in the abdominal cavity had endometriosis (17.11% compared with 3.08%; p<0.05). A significant proportion of patients in the main group had 2 or more abortions in the past.\nConclusions. According to the study results, risk factors for the formation of peritoneal adhesions in women of reproductive age include allergic diseases; surgery on the abdominal organs, especially repeated and performed on pelvic organs; drainage of the abdominal cavity after surgery; inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs and their recurrences; repeated surgical abortions.","PeriodicalId":419861,"journal":{"name":"Perinatology and reproductology: from research to practice","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perinatology and reproductology: from research to practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52705/2788-6190-2021-3-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective: to identify risk factors for the formation of peritoneal adhesions in women of reproductive age. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of histories of 187 women who were operated by laparoscopic access and diagnosis of peritoneal adhesions was carried out as the main or concomitant. Data on somatic, reproductive and gynecological history, age and social status were assessed. The comparison group consisted of 65 women in which peritoneal adhesions were not detected during surgery. Results. Analysis of the somatic history of women with and without adhesions in the abdominal cavity showed that women with adhesions had 3.2 (14.97% compared with 4.62%; p <0.05) times more often one or another type of allergy, and 3.5 times more often (10.70% and 3.07% respectively) had autoimmune diseases. Surgical interventions in the past were recorded in both groups, although their number was almost 6 times greater in patients with peritoneal adhesions (53.48% compared to 9.23%; p<0.05). In women with adhesions in the abdominal cavity, the percentage of operations on the pelvic organs was 2.5 times higher (85.00% compared to 33.33%; p<0.05), and only in this category of patients abdominal drainage was performed during surgery (22.4%; p<0.05). The study of gynecological morbidity in the examined women showed that patients with abdominal adhesions had 3.6 times more often inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs (61.50% compared to 16.92%; p<0.05), and every third had more than one episode of this pathology in history (33.68%; p<0.05). In addition, every fifth woman with adhesions in the abdominal cavity had endometriosis (17.11% compared with 3.08%; p<0.05). A significant proportion of patients in the main group had 2 or more abortions in the past. Conclusions. According to the study results, risk factors for the formation of peritoneal adhesions in women of reproductive age include allergic diseases; surgery on the abdominal organs, especially repeated and performed on pelvic organs; drainage of the abdominal cavity after surgery; inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs and their recurrences; repeated surgical abortions.
腹膜盆腔粘连患者遗忘的临床与统计回顾性分析
目的:确定育龄妇女腹膜粘连形成的危险因素。材料和方法。回顾性分析187例经腹腔镜手术的妇女的病史,并以腹膜粘连为主要或伴随诊断。评估了躯体、生殖和妇科病史、年龄和社会地位的数据。对照组为65例手术中未发现腹膜粘连的妇女。对有和无腹腔粘连的女性的躯体史进行分析,有腹腔粘连的女性有3.2例(14.97%比4.62%;发生自身免疫性疾病的比例分别为10.70%和3.07%,为3.5倍(P <0.05)。两组过去均有手术干预记录,尽管腹膜粘连患者的手术干预次数几乎是其6倍(53.48%比9.23%;p < 0.05)。在有腹腔粘连的女性中,盆腔器官手术的比例(85.00%比33.33%)高出2.5倍;P <0.05),且只有该类患者术中进行了腹腔引流(22.4%;p < 0.05)。对被检查妇女妇科发病率的研究表明,腹部粘连患者盆腔器官炎性疾病的发生率(61.50%比16.92%)高出3.6倍;P <0.05),三分之一的患者有过1次以上的病史(33.68%;p < 0.05)。此外,1 / 5的腹腔粘连患者发生子宫内膜异位症(17.11%比3.08%;p < 0.05)。主组患者有2次或2次以上流产史。根据研究结果,育龄妇女腹膜粘连形成的危险因素包括过敏性疾病;外科手术:在腹部器官上进行的外科手术,尤指在骨盆器官上反复进行的手术;术后腹腔引流;盆腔脏器炎性疾病及其复发;反复手术流产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信