Effects of context-based approaches on high school students’ epistemological beliefs

Wuleta Ketema Abebe, Habtamu Wodaj Tafari, Solomon Belay Faris
{"title":"Effects of context-based approaches on high school students’ epistemological beliefs","authors":"Wuleta Ketema Abebe, Habtamu Wodaj Tafari, Solomon Belay Faris","doi":"10.29333/ijese/12707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aimed to examine the effects of context-based approaches on students’ epistemological beliefs. The study used a quasi-experimental pre-post-test design with two treatment groups (TGs) and one comparison group (CG). A total of 131 grade ten students participated in the study. TG 1 received a relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating, and transferring (REACT) strategy of context-based teaching approach, whereas TG 2 received an instruction that was an integration of conventional instruction and context-based approach. Similarly, the CG received conventional instruction to teach the topic of heredity. The epistemological belief of students was measured using Colorado learning attitude science survey for biology version (CLASS-Bio) questionnaire. We analyzed the data using paired t-test and one-way ANOVA. The result indicated that a significant mean score differences was observed between the groups in favor of the TGs. However, a significant difference was not observed between TG 1 and TG 2. This implies that the context-based approach had a positive effect on students’ epistemological belief shifts towards expertise than the conventional instruction.","PeriodicalId":153155,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/12707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aimed to examine the effects of context-based approaches on students’ epistemological beliefs. The study used a quasi-experimental pre-post-test design with two treatment groups (TGs) and one comparison group (CG). A total of 131 grade ten students participated in the study. TG 1 received a relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating, and transferring (REACT) strategy of context-based teaching approach, whereas TG 2 received an instruction that was an integration of conventional instruction and context-based approach. Similarly, the CG received conventional instruction to teach the topic of heredity. The epistemological belief of students was measured using Colorado learning attitude science survey for biology version (CLASS-Bio) questionnaire. We analyzed the data using paired t-test and one-way ANOVA. The result indicated that a significant mean score differences was observed between the groups in favor of the TGs. However, a significant difference was not observed between TG 1 and TG 2. This implies that the context-based approach had a positive effect on students’ epistemological belief shifts towards expertise than the conventional instruction.
情境教学法对高中生认识论信念的影响
本研究旨在探讨情境教学法对学生认识论信念的影响。本研究采用准实验前-后测试设计,分为两个治疗组(tg)和一个对照组(CG)。共有131名十年级学生参与了这项研究。TG 1采用情境教学法的关联、体验、应用、合作和转移(REACT)策略,而TG 2采用传统教学与情境教学法的整合策略。同样地,CG接受传统的教导来教授遗传的话题。采用科罗拉多生物版学习态度科学调查(CLASS-Bio)问卷对学生的认识论信念进行了测量。我们使用配对t检验和单因素方差分析分析数据。结果表明,在支持TGs的组之间观察到显著的平均得分差异。然而,TG 1和TG 2之间没有显著差异。这意味着基于情境的方法比传统教学对学生向专业知识的认识论信念转变有积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信