VON NEUMANN-MORGENSTERN SOLUTIONS TO COOPERATIVE GAMES WITHOUT SIDE PAYMENTS

R. Aumann, B. Peleg
{"title":"VON NEUMANN-MORGENSTERN SOLUTIONS TO COOPERATIVE GAMES WITHOUT SIDE PAYMENTS","authors":"R. Aumann, B. Peleg","doi":"10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10418-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of side payments in the classical theory of ^-person games involves three restrictive assumptions. First, there must be a common medium of exchange (such as money) in which the side payments may be effected; next, the side payments must be physically and legally feasible; and finally, it is assumed that utility is \"unrestrictedly transferable,\" i.e. that each player's utility for money is a linear function of the amount of money. These assumptions severely limit the applicability of the classical theory; in particular, the last assumption has been characterized by Luce and Raiffa [2, p. 233] as being \"exceedingly restrictive—for many purposes it renders nperson theory next to useless.\" It is the purpose of this paper to present the outline of a theory that parallels the classical theory, but makes no use of side payments.* Our definitions are related to those given in [2, p. 234] and in [3], but whereas the previous work went no further than proposing definitions, the theory outlined here contains results which generalize a considerable portion of the classical theory. I t thus demonstrates that the restrictive side payment assumption is not necessary for the development of a theory based on the ideas of von Neumann and Morgenstern. Only a general description of the theory and statements of the more important theorems will be included here; details and proofs will be published elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":117054,"journal":{"name":"Classics in Game Theory","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1960-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"97","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classics in Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1960-10418-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

Abstract

The use of side payments in the classical theory of ^-person games involves three restrictive assumptions. First, there must be a common medium of exchange (such as money) in which the side payments may be effected; next, the side payments must be physically and legally feasible; and finally, it is assumed that utility is "unrestrictedly transferable," i.e. that each player's utility for money is a linear function of the amount of money. These assumptions severely limit the applicability of the classical theory; in particular, the last assumption has been characterized by Luce and Raiffa [2, p. 233] as being "exceedingly restrictive—for many purposes it renders nperson theory next to useless." It is the purpose of this paper to present the outline of a theory that parallels the classical theory, but makes no use of side payments.* Our definitions are related to those given in [2, p. 234] and in [3], but whereas the previous work went no further than proposing definitions, the theory outlined here contains results which generalize a considerable portion of the classical theory. I t thus demonstrates that the restrictive side payment assumption is not necessary for the development of a theory based on the ideas of von Neumann and Morgenstern. Only a general description of the theory and statements of the more important theorems will be included here; details and proofs will be published elsewhere.
无侧支付的合作博弈的Von neumann-morgenstern解决方案
在经典的多人博弈理论中,侧支付的使用包含三个限制性假设。首先,必须有一种共同的交换媒介(如货币),以实现附带支付;其次,附加支付必须在物理上和法律上可行;最后,假设效用是“无限制转移的”,即每个玩家的金钱效用是金钱数量的线性函数。这些假设严重限制了经典理论的适用性;尤其是最后一个假设,Luce和Raiffa[2,第233页]将其描述为“极其严格——在许多用途上,它使人论几乎毫无用处。”本文的目的是提出一个与经典理论平行的理论大纲,但不使用附带支付。*我们的定义与[2,p. 234]和[3]中给出的定义有关,但是先前的工作只是提出定义,这里概述的理论包含的结果概括了经典理论的相当一部分。因此,这表明限制性一方支付假设对于基于冯·诺伊曼和摩根斯坦思想的理论的发展是不必要的。这里只包括理论的一般描述和更重要的定理的陈述;细节和证明将在其他地方公布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信