Media-generated Shortcuts: Do Newspaper Headlines Present Another Roadblock for Low-information Rationality?

Blake Andrew
{"title":"Media-generated Shortcuts: Do Newspaper Headlines Present Another Roadblock for Low-information Rationality?","authors":"Blake Andrew","doi":"10.1177/1081180X07299795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies news headlines as media-generated shortcuts for heuristic information about politics. Functionally speaking, headlines are simplifying mechanisms that summarize and attract attention to what lies ahead (or below). Although previous research has demonstrated potentially powerful framing effects of headlines, comparatively little is known about the relationship actual news headlines have with the stories they introduce. This study aims to contribute to this area of research by comparing with their stories the content of newspaper headlines about the 2004 Canadian federal election campaign.The data set has been developed from a content analysis of news, opinion, and editorial articles about the election, drawn from five major Canadian daily newspapers during the campaign. Headlines and full-text stories both have been separately coded for emphasis (campaign oriented vs. issue oriented), party coverage, leader coverage, issues, and tone.The analysis shows a considerable difference between articles and their headlines in terms of emphasis and issue salience. It also demonstrates how the tone of election coverage appeared to change when viewed exclusively through the prism of the headlines versus the lens of full stories. Hence, voters who scanned headlines were supplied with a different set of heuristic cues than those paying closer attention.","PeriodicalId":145232,"journal":{"name":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"115","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07299795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 115

Abstract

This article identifies news headlines as media-generated shortcuts for heuristic information about politics. Functionally speaking, headlines are simplifying mechanisms that summarize and attract attention to what lies ahead (or below). Although previous research has demonstrated potentially powerful framing effects of headlines, comparatively little is known about the relationship actual news headlines have with the stories they introduce. This study aims to contribute to this area of research by comparing with their stories the content of newspaper headlines about the 2004 Canadian federal election campaign.The data set has been developed from a content analysis of news, opinion, and editorial articles about the election, drawn from five major Canadian daily newspapers during the campaign. Headlines and full-text stories both have been separately coded for emphasis (campaign oriented vs. issue oriented), party coverage, leader coverage, issues, and tone.The analysis shows a considerable difference between articles and their headlines in terms of emphasis and issue salience. It also demonstrates how the tone of election coverage appeared to change when viewed exclusively through the prism of the headlines versus the lens of full stories. Hence, voters who scanned headlines were supplied with a different set of heuristic cues than those paying closer attention.
媒体产生的捷径:报纸标题是否为低信息理性提供了另一个障碍?
本文将新闻标题定义为媒体生成的关于政治的启发式信息的快捷方式。从功能上讲,标题简化了总结和吸引人们注意前面(或下面)内容的机制。虽然之前的研究已经证明了标题潜在的强大框架效应,但相对而言,人们对实际新闻标题与其所介绍的故事之间的关系知之甚少。本研究旨在通过比较2004年加拿大联邦竞选活动的报纸头条内容,为这一研究领域做出贡献。该数据集是根据竞选期间加拿大五家主要日报对有关选举的新闻、观点和社论文章的内容分析而开发的。标题和全文报道都根据重点(竞选导向vs.议题导向)、政党报道、领导人报道、议题和语气分别编码。分析表明,文章和标题在重点和问题突出性方面存在相当大的差异。它还表明,当只从头条新闻的棱镜来看,而不是从完整故事的棱镜来看,选举报道的基调似乎发生了变化。因此,浏览标题的选民获得的启发式线索与密切关注的选民不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信