Determining the Impact of CAT Score in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Patients Health in Our Region

S. Choudhary
{"title":"Determining the Impact of CAT Score in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Patients Health in Our Region","authors":"S. Choudhary","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v8/11706d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COPD is a disease state that causes lot of human suffering, is now recognized as a common disease in developing countries and is one of the fastest growing chronic cause of death. Pulmonary function tests are essential for the diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of COPD but other measures of functional status such as dyspnoea, exercise performance and health status are important components of COPD that cannot be measured by this method. The COPD assessment test (CAT) is a new eight-item specific questionnaire and is intended to provide a short, simple and self-administered test for evaluating symptoms, in assessing the impact of COPD on health status (Quality Of Life) .This study shows the usefulness of CAT score in our region. The clinical characteristics, Gold Severity and FEVI 1 % of present study were compared with earlier studies of different countries. Total 70 patients with COPD were studied between May 2014 to September 2014.Detail clinical history was obtained .Assessment of symptom severity was made based on the CAT questioanaire.They were subjected to Pulmonary function test (pre and post bronchodilator therapy) and oxygen saturation measurement. Majority of the patients were Male 42 (60%).Total 41(58.6%) patients were smokers of which 36 (87.80%) were males.18(25.7%) patients had positive history of Chula exposure of which 17(94.44%) were females Mean Age of patients was 60.34 SD 9.9, Mean FEV1 62.33 SD 18.2, and SPO2 94.26 SD 2.27. Patients were classified into two groups. Group 1 of low symptoms having CAT Score 10.More than half of the patients 80% had a high CAT score of >10 of Group 2.Most of the patients were of moderate obstruction 50%. Patients in whom Forced expiratory volume in 1 s percent (FEV1%) predicted was significantly decreased had a significantly increased the CAT score (t = 2.67 p= .009). Patients with severe stage of the disease (as GOLD criteria) had high CAT score i.e. have a positive corelation whereas CAT score and FEVI % had inverse co relation. The mean FEV1% predicted was similar to France where as high compared to Germany ,Netherlands ,Spain and U.S.A. and lower than Belgium. The CAT questionnaire proves to be a sensitive test in detecting COPD health status as a simple and reliable tool. By the help of CAT questionnaire the patients and clinician’s awareness of COPD would be improved to make an early diagnosis thus providing a useful and objective tool for early recognition and long term clinical and therapeutic monitoring of COPD patients especially in the clinical settings where spirometry is not yet available. \nAims and Objectives:   \n \nCOPD Assessment TEST (CAT), in assessing the impact on COPD health status (Quality Of Life) in our region. \nUsefulness of CAT scoring in monitoring health status. \nComparison of clinical characteristics of present study with earlier studies of different countries","PeriodicalId":138368,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 8","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 8","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v8/11706d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COPD is a disease state that causes lot of human suffering, is now recognized as a common disease in developing countries and is one of the fastest growing chronic cause of death. Pulmonary function tests are essential for the diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of COPD but other measures of functional status such as dyspnoea, exercise performance and health status are important components of COPD that cannot be measured by this method. The COPD assessment test (CAT) is a new eight-item specific questionnaire and is intended to provide a short, simple and self-administered test for evaluating symptoms, in assessing the impact of COPD on health status (Quality Of Life) .This study shows the usefulness of CAT score in our region. The clinical characteristics, Gold Severity and FEVI 1 % of present study were compared with earlier studies of different countries. Total 70 patients with COPD were studied between May 2014 to September 2014.Detail clinical history was obtained .Assessment of symptom severity was made based on the CAT questioanaire.They were subjected to Pulmonary function test (pre and post bronchodilator therapy) and oxygen saturation measurement. Majority of the patients were Male 42 (60%).Total 41(58.6%) patients were smokers of which 36 (87.80%) were males.18(25.7%) patients had positive history of Chula exposure of which 17(94.44%) were females Mean Age of patients was 60.34 SD 9.9, Mean FEV1 62.33 SD 18.2, and SPO2 94.26 SD 2.27. Patients were classified into two groups. Group 1 of low symptoms having CAT Score 10.More than half of the patients 80% had a high CAT score of >10 of Group 2.Most of the patients were of moderate obstruction 50%. Patients in whom Forced expiratory volume in 1 s percent (FEV1%) predicted was significantly decreased had a significantly increased the CAT score (t = 2.67 p= .009). Patients with severe stage of the disease (as GOLD criteria) had high CAT score i.e. have a positive corelation whereas CAT score and FEVI % had inverse co relation. The mean FEV1% predicted was similar to France where as high compared to Germany ,Netherlands ,Spain and U.S.A. and lower than Belgium. The CAT questionnaire proves to be a sensitive test in detecting COPD health status as a simple and reliable tool. By the help of CAT questionnaire the patients and clinician’s awareness of COPD would be improved to make an early diagnosis thus providing a useful and objective tool for early recognition and long term clinical and therapeutic monitoring of COPD patients especially in the clinical settings where spirometry is not yet available. Aims and Objectives:   COPD Assessment TEST (CAT), in assessing the impact on COPD health status (Quality Of Life) in our region. Usefulness of CAT scoring in monitoring health status. Comparison of clinical characteristics of present study with earlier studies of different countries
确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者CAT评分的影响
慢性阻塞性肺病是一种会给人类带来很多痛苦的疾病状态,目前在发展中国家被认为是一种常见疾病,是增长最快的慢性死亡原因之一。肺功能检查对于诊断和评估COPD的严重程度至关重要,但其他功能状态的测量,如呼吸困难、运动表现和健康状况,是COPD的重要组成部分,无法通过这种方法测量。慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试(CAT)是一种新的八项特定问卷,旨在提供一种简短,简单和自我管理的测试来评估症状,评估慢性阻塞性肺病对健康状况(生活质量)的影响。这项研究表明CAT评分在我们地区的实用性。将本研究的临床特征、黄金严重程度和FEVI 1%与各国早期研究进行比较。2014年5月至2014年9月共对70例COPD患者进行了研究。获得详细的临床病史,根据CAT问卷评估症状严重程度。分别进行肺功能检查(支气管扩张剂治疗前后)和血氧饱和度测定。患者以男性42岁(60%)居多。吸烟41例(58.6%),其中男性36例(87.80%),有Chula暴露史18例(25.7%),其中女性17例(94.44%),平均年龄60.34 SD 9.9,平均FEV1 62.33 SD 18.2, SPO2 94.26 SD 2.27。患者分为两组。低症状组,CAT评分为10分。2组CAT评分>10分的患者占80%以上。大多数患者为中度梗阻,占50%。用力呼气量(FEV1%)预测显著降低的患者CAT评分显著升高(t = 2.67 p= 0.009)。重症患者(作为GOLD标准)的CAT评分较高,即CAT评分与FEVI %呈负相关,而CAT评分与FEVI %呈负相关。预测的平均FEV1%与法国相似,高于德国、荷兰、西班牙和美国,低于比利时。CAT问卷作为一种简单可靠的工具,是一种检测COPD健康状况的灵敏测试。通过CAT问卷,可以提高患者和临床医生对COPD的认识,从而进行早期诊断,从而为COPD患者的早期识别和长期临床和治疗监测提供有用和客观的工具,特别是在尚未使用肺量测定法的临床环境中。目的和目标:COPD评估测试(CAT),评估对本地区COPD健康状况(生活质量)的影响。CAT评分在监视运行状况中的用处。本研究的临床特点与各国早期研究的比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信