Critical & Creative Thinking Ability given the Inquiry Component in Elementary School Science Lessons

Ely Sarantika Sukma, Trijoko Raharjo, A. Cahyono
{"title":"Critical & Creative Thinking Ability given the Inquiry Component in Elementary School Science Lessons","authors":"Ely Sarantika Sukma, Trijoko Raharjo, A. Cahyono","doi":"10.23887/tscj.v5i2.52121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 21st-century skills are critical thinking skills and creative thinking skills. These skills are needed by someone to be successful in facing challenges, an increasingly complex and uncertain life, and to be successful in life and career in the world of work. This study aims to analyze critical and creative thinking skills in terms of the inquiry component in science learning in elementary schools. The research sample is elementary school students, with a total of 31 students. Data collection techniques used in this study were observation, tests, interviews, and documentation. The experimental research method used in this research is quasi-experimental. Quasi-experimental is used so that researchers can analyze the differences between the two treatments in the control class and the experimental class. The research design used was a non-equivalent control group design. The results of the analysis of critical and creative thinking skills for the control class inquiry model were 45.3% and 54.7%. In comparison, the experimental class obtained 65.5%, so the influence of the inquiry model on experimental class students is greater than the control class. The inquiry model has a positive effect on critical and creative thinking skills. With this research, the inquiry model can improve the critical thinking skills and creative thinking of fifth-grade elementary school students in science learning.","PeriodicalId":286072,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v5i2.52121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 21st-century skills are critical thinking skills and creative thinking skills. These skills are needed by someone to be successful in facing challenges, an increasingly complex and uncertain life, and to be successful in life and career in the world of work. This study aims to analyze critical and creative thinking skills in terms of the inquiry component in science learning in elementary schools. The research sample is elementary school students, with a total of 31 students. Data collection techniques used in this study were observation, tests, interviews, and documentation. The experimental research method used in this research is quasi-experimental. Quasi-experimental is used so that researchers can analyze the differences between the two treatments in the control class and the experimental class. The research design used was a non-equivalent control group design. The results of the analysis of critical and creative thinking skills for the control class inquiry model were 45.3% and 54.7%. In comparison, the experimental class obtained 65.5%, so the influence of the inquiry model on experimental class students is greater than the control class. The inquiry model has a positive effect on critical and creative thinking skills. With this research, the inquiry model can improve the critical thinking skills and creative thinking of fifth-grade elementary school students in science learning.
小学科学课探究部分的批判性与创造性思维能力
21世纪的技能是批判性思维技能和创造性思维技能。这些技能是一个人在面对挑战、日益复杂和不确定的生活时取得成功所需要的,也是在工作世界中取得生活和事业成功所需要的。本研究旨在分析小学科学学习中探究成分的批判性和创造性思维技能。研究样本为小学生,共31名学生。本研究使用的数据收集技术为观察、测试、访谈和记录。本研究采用的实验研究方法为准实验。采用准实验的方法,研究人员可以分析控制班和实验班两种治疗方法的差异。本研究采用非等效对照组设计。对照班探究模式的批判性和创造性思维技能分析结果分别为45.3%和54.7%。相比之下,实验班获得了65.5%,因此探究模式对实验班学生的影响大于对照组。探究模式对批判性和创造性思维技能有积极的影响。通过本研究,探究模式可以提高小学五年级学生在科学学习中的批判性思维能力和创造性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信