Effect of System Capability Verification on Conflict, Trust, and Behavior in Automated Vehicles

Marcel Woide, Mark Colley, Nicole Damm, M. Baumann
{"title":"Effect of System Capability Verification on Conflict, Trust, and Behavior in Automated Vehicles","authors":"Marcel Woide, Mark Colley, Nicole Damm, M. Baumann","doi":"10.1145/3543174.3545253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With automated driving, vehicles are no longer just tools but become teammates, which enable an increasing space of new interaction possibilities. By changing the relationship between the drivers and the automated vehicles (AV), conflicts regarding maneuver selection can occur. Conflicts can lead to safety-critical takeovers by the drivers. Current research mainly focuses on information requirements for takeovers, only a few works explored the factors necessary for automation engagement. Therefore, a fix-based driving simulator study with N=28 participants was conducted to investigate how verifiable information influences automation engagement, gaze behavior, trust, conflict, criticality, stress, and interaction perception. The results indicate, if drivers can verify the information given by the system, they perceive less conflict and more trust in the system, leading to a lower rejection frequency of an overtaking maneuver performed by an AV. The results indicate that systems that aim to prevent drivers initiated interventions should provide verifiable information.","PeriodicalId":284749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3545253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

With automated driving, vehicles are no longer just tools but become teammates, which enable an increasing space of new interaction possibilities. By changing the relationship between the drivers and the automated vehicles (AV), conflicts regarding maneuver selection can occur. Conflicts can lead to safety-critical takeovers by the drivers. Current research mainly focuses on information requirements for takeovers, only a few works explored the factors necessary for automation engagement. Therefore, a fix-based driving simulator study with N=28 participants was conducted to investigate how verifiable information influences automation engagement, gaze behavior, trust, conflict, criticality, stress, and interaction perception. The results indicate, if drivers can verify the information given by the system, they perceive less conflict and more trust in the system, leading to a lower rejection frequency of an overtaking maneuver performed by an AV. The results indicate that systems that aim to prevent drivers initiated interventions should provide verifiable information.
自动驾驶车辆系统能力验证对冲突、信任和行为的影响
有了自动驾驶,车辆不再只是工具,而是队友,这使得新的互动可能性的空间越来越大。通过改变驾驶员与自动驾驶车辆之间的关系,可能会产生机动选择方面的冲突。冲突可能导致司机对安全至关重要的接管。目前的研究主要集中在收购的信息需求上,只有少数作品探讨了自动化参与的必要因素。因此,本研究采用基于固定的驾驶模拟器研究,研究了可验证信息对自动化参与、注视行为、信任、冲突、临界性、压力和交互感知的影响。研究结果表明,如果驾驶员能够验证系统给出的信息,他们对系统的冲突感就会减少,对系统的信任度就会提高,从而导致自动驾驶汽车超车的拒绝频率降低。研究结果表明,旨在防止驾驶员主动干预的系统应该提供可验证的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信