Industrial marketing relationships and open‐to‐tender contracts

B. Donaldson
{"title":"Industrial marketing relationships and open‐to‐tender contracts","authors":"B. Donaldson","doi":"10.1108/EUM0000000000019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explores the complexity of supply‐chain management businesses, such as the motor industry and electronics, looking at new initiatives which are emerging between role partners in an effort to reconcile the needs of quality, cost reduction, innovation and customer satisfaction. Observes current trends towards achieving these difficult objectives which promote closer buyer‐seller relationships, joint ventures and strategic alliances, yet notes that the open‐to‐tender bidding process is still extensively used for a number of key components and services. Based on a study within the Scottish electronics industry, examines the effects of open‐to‐tender contracts on total quality management and on buyer‐supplier relationships. Suggests that, while both buyers and their suppliers are talking the relationship game, the reality is that the rules are seldom explicit, communication between the parties is inadequate and therefore relationships tend to be on a superficial level, and lacking real commitment on joint product development, cost reduction strategies and effective integrated systems. Found that competitive tendering came into conflict with the total quality management philosophy, and that attempts to build and sustain long‐term relationships were undermined by short‐term competitive pressures.","PeriodicalId":305809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Explores the complexity of supply‐chain management businesses, such as the motor industry and electronics, looking at new initiatives which are emerging between role partners in an effort to reconcile the needs of quality, cost reduction, innovation and customer satisfaction. Observes current trends towards achieving these difficult objectives which promote closer buyer‐seller relationships, joint ventures and strategic alliances, yet notes that the open‐to‐tender bidding process is still extensively used for a number of key components and services. Based on a study within the Scottish electronics industry, examines the effects of open‐to‐tender contracts on total quality management and on buyer‐supplier relationships. Suggests that, while both buyers and their suppliers are talking the relationship game, the reality is that the rules are seldom explicit, communication between the parties is inadequate and therefore relationships tend to be on a superficial level, and lacking real commitment on joint product development, cost reduction strategies and effective integrated systems. Found that competitive tendering came into conflict with the total quality management philosophy, and that attempts to build and sustain long‐term relationships were undermined by short‐term competitive pressures.
行业营销关系和公开招标合同
探索供应链管理业务的复杂性,如汽车行业和电子行业,着眼于角色合作伙伴之间出现的新举措,以努力协调质量,成本降低,创新和客户满意度的需求。观察到目前实现这些困难目标的趋势,这些目标促进了更紧密的买方-卖方关系、合资企业和战略联盟,但注意到公开投标过程仍然广泛用于许多关键组件和服务。基于苏格兰电子行业的一项研究,研究了公开招标合同对全面质量管理和买方-供应商关系的影响。这表明,虽然买家和他们的供应商都在谈论关系游戏,但现实情况是,规则很少明确,双方之间的沟通不足,因此关系往往是肤浅的,缺乏真正的承诺,共同开发产品,降低成本的战略和有效的集成系统。发现竞争性招标与全面质量管理理念相冲突,并且试图建立和维持长期关系被短期竞争压力所破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信