(Graph Database: A Survey)

Amitabha Bhattacharyya, Durgapada Chakravarty
{"title":"(Graph Database: A Survey)","authors":"Amitabha Bhattacharyya, Durgapada Chakravarty","doi":"10.1109/ICCECE48148.2020.9223105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advantages of Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) model and design methodology are being utilized by industry/institutions for any software design and implementation. The future of RDBMS certainly will be the Graph Databases with NoSql methodologies, which is emerging as beyond of relational model. In this paper, there is a need to highlight all the databases evolved after RDBMS. They couldn’t stay in market for so long period and survey has been made to highlight those databases after RDBMS. Relational Database Management System has certain advantages like (i) Storing in Tables, Column and Rows (ii) Data Storing in Normal Form (iii) Easy to use via SQL to retrieve information via complex join operators (iv) Maintainability via Reverse Engineering (v) Indexing and quick search. Due to these inherent features of RDBMS and SQL, it is necessary to explore and compare RDBMS with NoSQL methods to avoid complex join operation. Recently, numerous software industries and research institutions are trying their old RDBMS system to be re-engineered into some other architecture via nodes, edges and relationships where different type of information can be stored easily. So, it is a big challenges for any industry and institutions how quickly they can re-engineer their old RDBMS into Graph Databases which is also called now-a-days the future of databases. In this project, it is highlighted that the importance of the re-engineering work lies in three different directions such as (i) Comparison of RDBMS with GDBMS (Graph Database Management System) where face book, twitter, Amazon, Google are adopting (ii) Survey work of Graph Databases and (iii) Graph Database Models have increasingly become a topic of interest. The representation of data in the form of a graph lends itself well to structure a data with a schema. No standard system of query languages yet had been found to have been unique and stable for graph databases. Research and industry adoptions will determine the future direction of graph databases.(iv) Beyond RDBMS artifacts were established by industry and academics. It feeds a series of recycling collectives trying to eke out an existence of positive incentives and principles.","PeriodicalId":129001,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Computer, Electrical & Communication Engineering (ICCECE)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Computer, Electrical & Communication Engineering (ICCECE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCECE48148.2020.9223105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The advantages of Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) model and design methodology are being utilized by industry/institutions for any software design and implementation. The future of RDBMS certainly will be the Graph Databases with NoSql methodologies, which is emerging as beyond of relational model. In this paper, there is a need to highlight all the databases evolved after RDBMS. They couldn’t stay in market for so long period and survey has been made to highlight those databases after RDBMS. Relational Database Management System has certain advantages like (i) Storing in Tables, Column and Rows (ii) Data Storing in Normal Form (iii) Easy to use via SQL to retrieve information via complex join operators (iv) Maintainability via Reverse Engineering (v) Indexing and quick search. Due to these inherent features of RDBMS and SQL, it is necessary to explore and compare RDBMS with NoSQL methods to avoid complex join operation. Recently, numerous software industries and research institutions are trying their old RDBMS system to be re-engineered into some other architecture via nodes, edges and relationships where different type of information can be stored easily. So, it is a big challenges for any industry and institutions how quickly they can re-engineer their old RDBMS into Graph Databases which is also called now-a-days the future of databases. In this project, it is highlighted that the importance of the re-engineering work lies in three different directions such as (i) Comparison of RDBMS with GDBMS (Graph Database Management System) where face book, twitter, Amazon, Google are adopting (ii) Survey work of Graph Databases and (iii) Graph Database Models have increasingly become a topic of interest. The representation of data in the form of a graph lends itself well to structure a data with a schema. No standard system of query languages yet had been found to have been unique and stable for graph databases. Research and industry adoptions will determine the future direction of graph databases.(iv) Beyond RDBMS artifacts were established by industry and academics. It feeds a series of recycling collectives trying to eke out an existence of positive incentives and principles.
(图形数据库:调查)
关系数据库管理系统(RDBMS)模型和设计方法的优点正在被工业/机构用于任何软件设计和实现。RDBMS的未来肯定是采用NoSql方法的图数据库,它正在超越关系模型。在本文中,有必要强调在RDBMS之后发展的所有数据库。它们无法在市场上停留这么长时间,因此人们对RDBMS之后的数据库进行了调查。关系型数据库管理系统具有如下优点:(1)表、列、行存储(2)数据以标准形式存储(3)易于通过SQL通过复杂的连接操作符检索信息(4)通过逆向工程可维护性(5)索引和快速搜索。由于RDBMS和SQL的这些固有特性,有必要对RDBMS和NoSQL方法进行探索和比较,以避免复杂的连接操作。最近,许多软件行业和研究机构都在尝试通过节点、边缘和关系将旧的RDBMS系统重新设计成其他架构,以便轻松存储不同类型的信息。因此,对于任何行业和机构来说,如何快速地将旧的RDBMS重新设计成图形数据库是一个巨大的挑战,图形数据库也被称为当今数据库的未来。在这个项目中,它强调了再造工作的重要性在于三个不同的方向,如(i) RDBMS与GDBMS(图数据库管理系统)的比较,其中facebook, twitter, Amazon, b谷歌正在采用;(ii)图数据库的调查工作;(iii)图数据库模型日益成为一个感兴趣的话题。以图的形式表示数据很适合用模式构造数据。迄今为止,还没有发现一种标准的查询语言系统是唯一的、稳定的。研究和行业采用将决定图数据库的未来方向。(iv)超越RDBMS的工件是由行业和学术界建立的。它滋养了一系列的回收集体,试图维持积极的激励和原则的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信