Analysing the Sentiments in a Hybrid FLOSS Community based on Commits

L. Benedicenti, T. Mikkonen, Jurka Rahikkala
{"title":"Analysing the Sentiments in a Hybrid FLOSS Community\nbased on Commits","authors":"L. Benedicenti, T. Mikkonen, Jurka Rahikkala","doi":"10.11159/cist21.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open source repositories, by their nature, are open for study. This has inspired researchers to study them using various tools, leading to an established body of knowledge regarding how developers execute their work, communicate, and coordinate the effort. One flavor of open source community, which has received less attention, is hybrid open source, where developers and other stakeholders with various backgrounds exist. In this paper, we perform a sentiment analysis to a hybrid open source community, based on comments given when making commits. The goal is to understand if the community members behave differently, depending on their background in the company that owns the community IPR, being an independent contributor, or representing a collaborating organization. Based on the results, we find that there indeed is a clear difference in the sentiments, with in-house developers having a tendency to be more negative than independent developers, who in contrast express positive sentiments in their commit comments.","PeriodicalId":433404,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/cist21.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open source repositories, by their nature, are open for study. This has inspired researchers to study them using various tools, leading to an established body of knowledge regarding how developers execute their work, communicate, and coordinate the effort. One flavor of open source community, which has received less attention, is hybrid open source, where developers and other stakeholders with various backgrounds exist. In this paper, we perform a sentiment analysis to a hybrid open source community, based on comments given when making commits. The goal is to understand if the community members behave differently, depending on their background in the company that owns the community IPR, being an independent contributor, or representing a collaborating organization. Based on the results, we find that there indeed is a clear difference in the sentiments, with in-house developers having a tendency to be more negative than independent developers, who in contrast express positive sentiments in their commit comments.
基于提交的混合FLOSS社区情感分析
开源存储库,就其本质而言,是开放供研究的。这激发了研究人员使用各种工具来研究它们,从而形成了关于开发人员如何执行工作、沟通和协调工作的既定知识体系。有一种类型的开源社区受到的关注较少,那就是混合开源,其中存在着具有不同背景的开发人员和其他涉众。在本文中,我们基于提交时给出的评论对混合开源社区进行了情感分析。目标是了解社区成员的行为是否不同,这取决于他们在拥有社区知识产权的公司的背景,是独立的贡献者,还是代表一个合作组织。根据结果,我们发现确实存在明显的情绪差异,内部开发者比独立开发者更倾向于消极,而独立开发者则在提交评论中表达积极的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信