Highest Wireless Power: Inductively Coupled Or RF?

N. Xing, G. Rincón-Mora
{"title":"Highest Wireless Power: Inductively Coupled Or RF?","authors":"N. Xing, G. Rincón-Mora","doi":"10.1109/ISQED48828.2020.9136990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Embedded microsensors are the critical components for the Internet of Things (IoT) as they provide interfaces between the physical and the digital worlds. Unfortunately, these microsensors' tiny batteries cannot sustain their operation for long. Ambient energy sources, such as light or motion, are not always available, so transmitting power wirelessly is often the only option to recharge their onboard batteries. This paper discusses and compares two of the most popular wireless power transfer technologies: inductively coupled and RF, in terms of their highest output power over distance. As an example, a 125 kHz, coil-based inductively coupled power transfer system is compared with a 2.45 GHz, antenna-based RF power transfer system. When closely coupled, the inductively coupled receiver outputs higher power density with a normalized transmitter. As the distance grows, the power density of the inductively coupled receiver decays 3 times faster than the RF. So past 3.5 times of the transmitter's length, the RF's power density beats the inductively coupled.","PeriodicalId":225828,"journal":{"name":"2020 21st International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 21st International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED48828.2020.9136990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Embedded microsensors are the critical components for the Internet of Things (IoT) as they provide interfaces between the physical and the digital worlds. Unfortunately, these microsensors' tiny batteries cannot sustain their operation for long. Ambient energy sources, such as light or motion, are not always available, so transmitting power wirelessly is often the only option to recharge their onboard batteries. This paper discusses and compares two of the most popular wireless power transfer technologies: inductively coupled and RF, in terms of their highest output power over distance. As an example, a 125 kHz, coil-based inductively coupled power transfer system is compared with a 2.45 GHz, antenna-based RF power transfer system. When closely coupled, the inductively coupled receiver outputs higher power density with a normalized transmitter. As the distance grows, the power density of the inductively coupled receiver decays 3 times faster than the RF. So past 3.5 times of the transmitter's length, the RF's power density beats the inductively coupled.
最高无线功率:电感耦合还是射频?
嵌入式微传感器是物联网(IoT)的关键组件,因为它们提供了物理世界和数字世界之间的接口。不幸的是,这些微型传感器的微型电池不能长时间运行。光线或运动等环境能源并不总是可用的,因此无线传输电力通常是为车载电池充电的唯一选择。本文讨论并比较了两种最流行的无线功率传输技术:电感耦合和射频,在它们的最高输出功率的距离。作为一个例子,125 kHz,基于线圈的电感耦合功率传输系统与2.45 GHz,基于天线的射频功率传输系统进行比较。当紧密耦合时,电感耦合接收器与归一化发射器输出更高的功率密度。随着距离的增加,电感耦合接收器的功率密度衰减速度是射频衰减速度的3倍。因此,超过发射器长度的3.5倍,射频的功率密度优于电感耦合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信