Institutionalised educational systems as a component of the intangible cultural legacy of Ukraine

S. Volkov
{"title":"Institutionalised educational systems as a component of the intangible cultural legacy of Ukraine","authors":"S. Volkov","doi":"10.59214/2786-7110-2023-2-1-6-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there has been an intensification of broad discussion of the problem of preserving intangible cultural legacy in the scientific, cultural, and social environment. Therewith, art education as an institutionalised educational system and a set of performing, pedagogical, compositional, art history, and other practices have not yet been considered in the scientific literature as a substantial component of the intangible cultural legacy, which determines the relevance of this study. The author attempts to direct scientific thought to the consideration of educational artistic practices as part of the intangible cultural legacy in the aspect of preservation in modern institutionalised educational systems. The study uses a set of methods: historical-cultural, systematic and interdisciplinary approaches, comparative analysis, generalisation and systematisation, aimed at highlighting the place of art education in the system of intangible cultural legacy. The issues of preserving the practices of intangible cultural legacy accumulated in the experience of teaching groups of the Kyiv Lysenko State Music Lyceum, Lviv Krushelnytska State Music Lyceum, Odesa School of Stolyarsky, and Kharkiv State Music Lyceum are considered During the 20th century, the teaching staff of these educational institutions created a number of personalised pedagogical schools that presented their own methods of training musical personnel in combination with higher art educational institutions. This allowed art education in Ukraine to be institutionalised into a separate specific branch, which applied the meritocratic principle in the organisation of the educational process, which gives grounds to consider these educational practices as an intangible cultural legacy of the state. The study focuses on the experience of preserving educational practices of the intangible cultural legacy of Hungary and China as examples for Ukraine. The system of training musical and, more broadly, artistic personnel has all the signs of exclusivity and is worthy of scientific justification to preserve the experience of several generations of musicians who combine performing and pedagogical practice. The inclusion of the best practices of the collectives of the Kyiv, Lviv, Odesa, and Kharkiv music lyceums in the national list of elements of the intangible cultural legacy of UNESCO will be one of the measures for their preservation and meets the goals of the convention for the protection of the intangible cultural legacy of UNESCO","PeriodicalId":359462,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Cultural and Humanities Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59214/2786-7110-2023-2-1-6-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an intensification of broad discussion of the problem of preserving intangible cultural legacy in the scientific, cultural, and social environment. Therewith, art education as an institutionalised educational system and a set of performing, pedagogical, compositional, art history, and other practices have not yet been considered in the scientific literature as a substantial component of the intangible cultural legacy, which determines the relevance of this study. The author attempts to direct scientific thought to the consideration of educational artistic practices as part of the intangible cultural legacy in the aspect of preservation in modern institutionalised educational systems. The study uses a set of methods: historical-cultural, systematic and interdisciplinary approaches, comparative analysis, generalisation and systematisation, aimed at highlighting the place of art education in the system of intangible cultural legacy. The issues of preserving the practices of intangible cultural legacy accumulated in the experience of teaching groups of the Kyiv Lysenko State Music Lyceum, Lviv Krushelnytska State Music Lyceum, Odesa School of Stolyarsky, and Kharkiv State Music Lyceum are considered During the 20th century, the teaching staff of these educational institutions created a number of personalised pedagogical schools that presented their own methods of training musical personnel in combination with higher art educational institutions. This allowed art education in Ukraine to be institutionalised into a separate specific branch, which applied the meritocratic principle in the organisation of the educational process, which gives grounds to consider these educational practices as an intangible cultural legacy of the state. The study focuses on the experience of preserving educational practices of the intangible cultural legacy of Hungary and China as examples for Ukraine. The system of training musical and, more broadly, artistic personnel has all the signs of exclusivity and is worthy of scientific justification to preserve the experience of several generations of musicians who combine performing and pedagogical practice. The inclusion of the best practices of the collectives of the Kyiv, Lviv, Odesa, and Kharkiv music lyceums in the national list of elements of the intangible cultural legacy of UNESCO will be one of the measures for their preservation and meets the goals of the convention for the protection of the intangible cultural legacy of UNESCO
制度化的教育系统是乌克兰非物质文化遗产的组成部分
近年来,关于非物质文化遗产在科学、文化和社会环境中的保护问题的广泛讨论愈演愈烈。因此,艺术教育作为一种制度化的教育体系,以及一套表演、教学、作曲、艺术史和其他实践,尚未在科学文献中被视为非物质文化遗产的重要组成部分,这决定了本研究的相关性。笔者试图将科学的思考引向教育艺术实践作为非物质文化遗产在现代制度化教育体系中的保存问题。该研究采用了一系列方法:历史文化、系统和跨学科方法、比较分析、概括和系统化,旨在突出艺术教育在非物质文化遗产系统中的地位。保存基辅李森科国立音乐学院、利沃夫克鲁谢利尼茨卡国立音乐学院、敖德萨斯托利亚尔斯基学院和哈尔科夫国立音乐学院的教学团队积累的非物质文化遗产的实践问题在20世纪得到了考虑。这些教育机构的教学人员创建了许多个性化的教学学校,并结合高等艺术教育机构提出了自己的音乐人才培养方法。这使得乌克兰的艺术教育制度化,成为一个单独的特定分支,在教育过程的组织中应用精英原则,这就有理由将这些教育实践视为国家的非物质文化遗产。本研究的重点是匈牙利和中国的非物质文化遗产教育实践保护经验,为乌克兰提供借鉴。培养音乐人员,更广泛地说,艺术人员的系统具有排他性的所有迹象,值得科学证明,以保留几代音乐家将表演和教学实践结合起来的经验。将基辅、利沃夫、敖德萨和哈尔科夫音乐学院集体的最佳做法列入联合国教科文组织非物质文化遗产国家名录,将是保护这些集体的措施之一,符合《保护联合国教科文组织非物质文化遗产公约》的目标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信