Analysis of Technical, Allocative and Economic Efficiencies of Vitamin A Cassava Farmers with Other Improved Cassava Farmers in Benue State, Nigeria.

W.E. Igbaifua, O. Adeniyi, R. Omolehin
{"title":"Analysis of Technical, Allocative and Economic Efficiencies of Vitamin A Cassava Farmers with Other Improved Cassava Farmers in Benue State, Nigeria.","authors":"W.E. Igbaifua, O. Adeniyi, R. Omolehin","doi":"10.47941/jap.777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Despite that cassava is important economically and nutritionally, a gap exists between its demand and supply. Consequently, analysis of technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of Vitamin A Cassava (VAC) farmers with other improved cassava (OIC) farmers in Benue State, Nigeria was conducted. \nMethodology:  A five- stage sampling technique was employed to select 120 farmers in the study area. Primary data were obtained using structured questionnaire and interview methods to seek information on socio-economic characteristics of farmers, inputs, outputs, and constraints to cassava production. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, stochastic frontier production function and cost function. \nFindings: The result revealed that profitability alone is not the only determinant for cassava cultivation, other factors were adequate finance, farmland, planting material, labour, nutrition and market. Five major determinants of cassava production were farm size, family labour, stem, herbicide and hired labour. Education, farming experience, gender and extension contacts significantly influenced farm -specific profit inefficiencies. OIC farmers showed higher allocative efficiency (0.78) than VAC farmers (0.75) and lower economic mean efficiency (0.66) than VAC farmers (0.76). The VAC farms were more profitable than OIC farms with gross margin of ₦181,120 and ₦105,620 per hectare of land, return on investment (1.68 and 0.86). The mean efficiencies of both practices were significant(p<05). The OIC and VAC farmers were operating at the second level of production frontier with return to scale of less than unity (0.457 and 0.448). Constraints identified are inadequate finance, expensive stems, inadequate extension agents’ visit, low market demand, high labour cost and grazing of farmland by herders. \nUnique contribution to theory, practice, and policy: Vitamin A Cassava and other improved cassava were smallholder farmers who were technologically inspired to transform inputs into output to earn income, food for households and poverty alleviation, and to achieve these, they need to improve on technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of production. It is recommended that cassava farmers develop saving culture and enter contract farming, multiply cassava stems, employ labour-saving technologies, government to create ready markets and encourage herders to establish ranches to prevent incursion of roaming cattle herds into farms.","PeriodicalId":109425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Policy","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/jap.777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite that cassava is important economically and nutritionally, a gap exists between its demand and supply. Consequently, analysis of technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of Vitamin A Cassava (VAC) farmers with other improved cassava (OIC) farmers in Benue State, Nigeria was conducted. Methodology:  A five- stage sampling technique was employed to select 120 farmers in the study area. Primary data were obtained using structured questionnaire and interview methods to seek information on socio-economic characteristics of farmers, inputs, outputs, and constraints to cassava production. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, stochastic frontier production function and cost function. Findings: The result revealed that profitability alone is not the only determinant for cassava cultivation, other factors were adequate finance, farmland, planting material, labour, nutrition and market. Five major determinants of cassava production were farm size, family labour, stem, herbicide and hired labour. Education, farming experience, gender and extension contacts significantly influenced farm -specific profit inefficiencies. OIC farmers showed higher allocative efficiency (0.78) than VAC farmers (0.75) and lower economic mean efficiency (0.66) than VAC farmers (0.76). The VAC farms were more profitable than OIC farms with gross margin of ₦181,120 and ₦105,620 per hectare of land, return on investment (1.68 and 0.86). The mean efficiencies of both practices were significant(p<05). The OIC and VAC farmers were operating at the second level of production frontier with return to scale of less than unity (0.457 and 0.448). Constraints identified are inadequate finance, expensive stems, inadequate extension agents’ visit, low market demand, high labour cost and grazing of farmland by herders. Unique contribution to theory, practice, and policy: Vitamin A Cassava and other improved cassava were smallholder farmers who were technologically inspired to transform inputs into output to earn income, food for households and poverty alleviation, and to achieve these, they need to improve on technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of production. It is recommended that cassava farmers develop saving culture and enter contract farming, multiply cassava stems, employ labour-saving technologies, government to create ready markets and encourage herders to establish ranches to prevent incursion of roaming cattle herds into farms.
尼日利亚贝努埃州维生素A木薯种植者与其他改良木薯种植者的技术、配置和经济效率分析
目的:尽管木薯具有重要的经济和营养价值,但其需求和供应之间存在缺口。因此,对尼日利亚贝努埃州维生素A木薯(VAC)农民与其他改良木薯(OIC)农民的技术、配置和经济效率进行了分析。方法:采用五阶段抽样法对研究区120名农民进行抽样调查。通过结构化问卷调查和访谈方法获得原始数据,以寻求农民的社会经济特征、投入、产出和制约木薯生产的信息。采用描述性统计、随机前沿生产函数和成本函数对数据进行分析。结果表明,盈利能力并不是决定木薯种植的唯一因素,其他因素还包括充足的资金、农田、种植材料、劳动力、营养和市场。木薯产量的五个主要决定因素是农场规模、家庭劳动力、茎干、除草剂和雇佣劳动力。教育、农业经验、性别和推广联系显著影响了农场特有的利润效率低下。OIC农户的配置效率(0.78)高于VAC农户(0.75),经济平均效率(0.66)低于VAC农户(0.76)。VAC农场比OIC农场更有利可图,每公顷土地的毛利率分别为181,120奈拉和105,620奈拉,投资回报率分别为1.68和0.86。两种方法的平均效率均显著(p< 0.05)。OIC和VAC农民处于生产边界的第二层,规模回报小于1(0.457和0.448)。确定的制约因素包括资金不足、茎材昂贵、推广人员访问不足、市场需求低、劳动力成本高以及牧民放牧农田。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:维生素A木薯和其他改良木薯是受到技术启发的小农,他们将投入转化为产出,以赚取收入、家庭粮食和减轻贫困,为了实现这些目标,他们需要提高生产的技术、配置和经济效率。建议木薯农民发展节约型文化,实行合同农业,种植大量木薯,采用节省劳动力的技术,政府创造现成的市场,并鼓励牧民建立牧场,以防止流浪的牛群侵入农场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信