Comparison and Performance Analysis of Ring Oscillators and Current-Starved VCO in 180-nm CMOS Technology

Keshab Das, Nigidita Pradhan, Vipin Kumar, S. K. Jana
{"title":"Comparison and Performance Analysis of Ring Oscillators and Current-Starved VCO in 180-nm CMOS Technology","authors":"Keshab Das, Nigidita Pradhan, Vipin Kumar, S. K. Jana","doi":"10.1109/ISDCS49393.2020.9263006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study between two Ring oscillators architecture (CMOS, NMOS) and current- starved Voltage-controlled oscillator (CS-VCO) on the basis of their performance parameters (Power consumption, Phase- Noise and Output Swing). All the design has been done in 180- nm CMOS technology node and 2.5 GHz Centre frequency have been opted for the comparison because of their applications in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth regime. An intuitive idea of the stated performance parameters has been achieved through the comparative study. The comparative data shows that NMOS based Ring oscillator is best option in terms of the phase noise performance. In this study NMOS Ring Oscillator have achieved a phase noise -72.94 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset frequency from 2.5 GHz centre frequency. The comparative data also mirrors that CMOS Ring oscillator is the best option in terms of power consumption. In this work CMOS Ring oscillator drained a power of 4.61 μW which is quite low.","PeriodicalId":177307,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Symposium on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ISDCS)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Symposium on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ISDCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDCS49393.2020.9263006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study between two Ring oscillators architecture (CMOS, NMOS) and current- starved Voltage-controlled oscillator (CS-VCO) on the basis of their performance parameters (Power consumption, Phase- Noise and Output Swing). All the design has been done in 180- nm CMOS technology node and 2.5 GHz Centre frequency have been opted for the comparison because of their applications in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth regime. An intuitive idea of the stated performance parameters has been achieved through the comparative study. The comparative data shows that NMOS based Ring oscillator is best option in terms of the phase noise performance. In this study NMOS Ring Oscillator have achieved a phase noise -72.94 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset frequency from 2.5 GHz centre frequency. The comparative data also mirrors that CMOS Ring oscillator is the best option in terms of power consumption. In this work CMOS Ring oscillator drained a power of 4.61 μW which is quite low.
180纳米CMOS环形振荡器与缺流压控振荡器的比较与性能分析
本文对两种环形振荡器(CMOS、NMOS)和缺流压控振荡器(CS-VCO)的性能参数(功耗、相位噪声和输出摆幅)进行了比较研究。所有的设计都是在180纳米CMOS技术节点上完成的,由于其在Wi-Fi和蓝牙系统中的应用,我们选择了2.5 GHz中心频率作为比较。通过对比研究,对所述性能参数有了直观的认识。对比数据表明,基于NMOS的环形振荡器在相位噪声性能方面是最佳选择。在本研究中,NMOS环形振荡器在2.5 GHz中心频率的1 MHz偏移频率下实现了-72.94 dBc/Hz的相位噪声。对比数据也反映出CMOS环形振荡器在功耗方面是最佳选择。在这项工作中,CMOS环形振荡器功耗为4.61 μW,相当低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信