An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions in English Textbook Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy

I. Laila, Ima Fitriyah
{"title":"An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions in English Textbook Based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy","authors":"I. Laila, Ima Fitriyah","doi":"10.33541/jet.v8i1.3394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading implies something complex which needs the students to experience, foresee, examine, and admit information based on their background of knowledge. It will be more complex if they lack of Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). HOTS improves reading comprehension and in consequence, the teachers must create a teaching and learning activities that encourage the implementation of HOTS by giving the students high questions found in a suitable textbook. This research was done in order to know the number of reading comprehension questions’ level between HOTS and LOTS. This research conducted using qualitative research approach and content analysis research design because this research focused on analyzing a textbook entitled “Bahasa Inggris” SMA/MA/SMK/MK for 12th grade students published by Ministry of Education and Culture in 2018. The result of this research found 142 reading comprehension questions in total and 83% of them are categorized as LOTS while 17% categorized as HOTS. It indicated that this textbook concentrated more on lower-level than higher-level thinking questions. In conclusion, the teacher must construct their own reading comprehension questions in order to fill the need of the students’ HOTS.","PeriodicalId":201732,"journal":{"name":"JET (Journal of English Teaching)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JET (Journal of English Teaching)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reading implies something complex which needs the students to experience, foresee, examine, and admit information based on their background of knowledge. It will be more complex if they lack of Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). HOTS improves reading comprehension and in consequence, the teachers must create a teaching and learning activities that encourage the implementation of HOTS by giving the students high questions found in a suitable textbook. This research was done in order to know the number of reading comprehension questions’ level between HOTS and LOTS. This research conducted using qualitative research approach and content analysis research design because this research focused on analyzing a textbook entitled “Bahasa Inggris” SMA/MA/SMK/MK for 12th grade students published by Ministry of Education and Culture in 2018. The result of this research found 142 reading comprehension questions in total and 83% of them are categorized as LOTS while 17% categorized as HOTS. It indicated that this textbook concentrated more on lower-level than higher-level thinking questions. In conclusion, the teacher must construct their own reading comprehension questions in order to fill the need of the students’ HOTS.
基于修订后布鲁姆分类的英语教材阅读理解题分析
阅读意味着一些复杂的东西,需要学生根据他们的知识背景去体验、预见、检查和接受信息。如果他们缺乏高阶思维技能(HOTS),情况会更加复杂。HOTS提高了阅读理解能力,因此,教师必须通过给学生在合适的教科书中找到的高问题来创建一个鼓励实施HOTS的教学活动。本研究是为了了解阅读理解题的数量在hot和LOTS之间的水平。本研究采用定性研究方法和内容分析研究设计,以2018年教育部出版的《马来文》12年级教材SMA/MA/SMK/MK为研究对象。本研究共发现142道阅读理解题,其中83%为lot类题,17%为hot类题。这表明,这本教科书更侧重于低层次的思维问题,而不是高层次的思维问题。综上所述,教师必须构建自己的阅读理解问题,以满足学生的阅读理解需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信