Bladder Outlet Obstruction in the Female Overactive Bladder: Correct Diagnostic Criteria for Bladder Outlet Obstruction?

S. Cho, S. Kim, Joon Chul Kim
{"title":"Bladder Outlet Obstruction in the Female Overactive Bladder: Correct Diagnostic Criteria for Bladder Outlet Obstruction?","authors":"S. Cho, S. Kim, Joon Chul Kim","doi":"10.5213/JKCS.2008.12.2.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Puropose: We analyzed retrospectively the result of urodynamic studies of the female patients with overactive bladder to reveal the incidence of accompanying bladder outlet obstruction and compared the urodynamic charateristics according to the diagnostic criteria for bladder outlet obstruction to help make the appropriate diagnosis. Material and methods: A total of 230 women who underwent urodynamic studies for evaluation of overactive bladder were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were classified as having obstruction based on two criteria, including one pressure flow cutoff point criteria (free Qmax < 12ml/ sec and pdetQmax ≧ 20cmH2O) (group I) and moderate or severe obstruction by the Blaivas- Groutz nomogram (group II). Urodynamic characteristics of the patients in Group 1 and 2 were compared with those of 42 patients having only overactive bladder without any voiding symptom (OAB group). Results: Of the patients 31 (13.5%) were in group I, 42 (18.3%) in group II. Qmax of group I was the lowest among 3 groups. Detrusor pressure at maximum measurable flow and maximum detrusor pressure during voiding in group 1 and II were significantly higher than in OAB group. Detrusor overactivity was more observed in group I and II, and there was no signigicant difference in the presence of voiding symptoms between group I and II. Only 9 patients (4%) had obstruction by both of criteria. Conclusions: Considering the high incidence of bladder outlet obstruction in the patients of overactive bladder and non-specificity of the symptoms by bladder outlet obstruction, thorough urodynamic study may be helpful in detection and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction of the overactive bladder patients. The further study for the criteria of female bladder outlet obstruction should be necessary to make its accurate diagnosis. (J Korean Continence Soc 2008;12:145-9)","PeriodicalId":231333,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Continence Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5213/JKCS.2008.12.2.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Puropose: We analyzed retrospectively the result of urodynamic studies of the female patients with overactive bladder to reveal the incidence of accompanying bladder outlet obstruction and compared the urodynamic charateristics according to the diagnostic criteria for bladder outlet obstruction to help make the appropriate diagnosis. Material and methods: A total of 230 women who underwent urodynamic studies for evaluation of overactive bladder were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were classified as having obstruction based on two criteria, including one pressure flow cutoff point criteria (free Qmax < 12ml/ sec and pdetQmax ≧ 20cmH2O) (group I) and moderate or severe obstruction by the Blaivas- Groutz nomogram (group II). Urodynamic characteristics of the patients in Group 1 and 2 were compared with those of 42 patients having only overactive bladder without any voiding symptom (OAB group). Results: Of the patients 31 (13.5%) were in group I, 42 (18.3%) in group II. Qmax of group I was the lowest among 3 groups. Detrusor pressure at maximum measurable flow and maximum detrusor pressure during voiding in group 1 and II were significantly higher than in OAB group. Detrusor overactivity was more observed in group I and II, and there was no signigicant difference in the presence of voiding symptoms between group I and II. Only 9 patients (4%) had obstruction by both of criteria. Conclusions: Considering the high incidence of bladder outlet obstruction in the patients of overactive bladder and non-specificity of the symptoms by bladder outlet obstruction, thorough urodynamic study may be helpful in detection and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction of the overactive bladder patients. The further study for the criteria of female bladder outlet obstruction should be necessary to make its accurate diagnosis. (J Korean Continence Soc 2008;12:145-9)
女性膀胱过度活动膀胱出口梗阻:膀胱出口梗阻的正确诊断标准?
目的:回顾性分析女性膀胱过度活动患者的尿动力学检查结果,揭示膀胱出口梗阻的发生率,并根据膀胱出口梗阻的诊断标准比较尿动力学特征,以帮助正确诊断。材料和方法:对230名接受尿动力学研究以评估膀胱过度活动的女性进行回顾性分析。根据1个压力流截断点标准(自由Qmax < 12ml/ sec, pdetQmax≧20cmH2O) (I组)和Blaivas- Groutz图(II组)将患者分为梗阻。将1、2组患者的尿动力学特征与42例无排尿症状的膀胱过度活动患者(OAB组)进行比较。结果:ⅰ组31例(13.5%),ⅱ组42例(18.3%)。第1组的Qmax在3组中最低。最大可测流量时逼尿肌压力及排尿时最大逼尿肌压力均显著高于OAB组。逼尿肌过度活动在I组和II组中更为明显,而排尿症状在I组和II组之间没有显著差异。只有9例(4%)患者同时符合两项标准。结论:考虑到膀胱过动症患者膀胱出口梗阻发生率高,且膀胱出口梗阻症状无特异性,深入的尿动力学研究可能有助于膀胱过动症患者膀胱出口梗阻的发现和治疗。为准确诊断女性膀胱出口梗阻,有必要进一步研究其诊断标准。(韩国自制学报2008;12:145-9)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信