{"title":"SEBUAH TELAAH ATAS REGULASI DAN PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI INDONESIA DALAM PARADIGMA SUPPORTED DECISION MAKING","authors":"Puspaningtyas Panglipurjati","doi":"10.25170/paradigma.v6i02.2586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata regulates that an adult, who is in a continuous state of simple-mindedness, insanity or rage, shall be placed under conservatorship, notwithstanding that he might have mental capacity from time to time (mental disabilities). Similiar to that, Undang-Undang Penyandang Disabilitas regulates that people with disabilities can be declared as incapable of the law and placed under conservatorship by court judgment. The consequence of that conservatorship is an individual placed in conservatorship has no legal capacity and prohibited to do any legal action by themself. The perspective that be used in that two regulations and some court judgments in giving conservatorship is substituted decision making which the conservator substitutes the position of an individual placed in conservatorship. This concept actually is no longer appropriate with the new paradigm brought by CRPD, supported decision making. This issue makes the researcher did a normative research by using some secondary data as regulations and also some conservatorship court judgment. Based on the research, the researcher found that the regulations and some conservatorship court judgment do not support the efforts to fulfill the rights of person with disabilities to got an equality before the law especially to make any decisions. \n ","PeriodicalId":445925,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v6i02.2586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata regulates that an adult, who is in a continuous state of simple-mindedness, insanity or rage, shall be placed under conservatorship, notwithstanding that he might have mental capacity from time to time (mental disabilities). Similiar to that, Undang-Undang Penyandang Disabilitas regulates that people with disabilities can be declared as incapable of the law and placed under conservatorship by court judgment. The consequence of that conservatorship is an individual placed in conservatorship has no legal capacity and prohibited to do any legal action by themself. The perspective that be used in that two regulations and some court judgments in giving conservatorship is substituted decision making which the conservator substitutes the position of an individual placed in conservatorship. This concept actually is no longer appropriate with the new paradigm brought by CRPD, supported decision making. This issue makes the researcher did a normative research by using some secondary data as regulations and also some conservatorship court judgment. Based on the research, the researcher found that the regulations and some conservatorship court judgment do not support the efforts to fulfill the rights of person with disabilities to got an equality before the law especially to make any decisions.
《Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata》规定,对持续头脑简单、精神错乱或愤怒的成年人应予以监护,尽管他可能不时有精神能力(精神残疾)。与此类似,《Undang-Undang Penyandang Disabilitas》规定,残疾人可以被宣布为无法律行为能力,并由法院判决予以监护。这种监护的后果是被监护的个人没有法律行为能力,不能自行采取任何法律行动。在这两个条例和一些法院判决中使用的观点是替代决策,即保管人取代了被置于保管权中的个人的地位。这个概念实际上已经不再适合CRPD带来的新范式,支持决策。这一问题使得研究者利用一些二手资料作为规范,并结合一些托管法院的判决进行了规范性研究。在研究的基础上,研究人员发现,法规和一些监护法院的判决并不支持残疾人在法律面前获得平等的权利,特别是做出任何决定的努力。