SEBUAH TELAAH ATAS REGULASI DAN PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI INDONESIA DALAM PARADIGMA SUPPORTED DECISION MAKING

Puspaningtyas Panglipurjati
{"title":"SEBUAH TELAAH ATAS REGULASI DAN PENETAPAN PENGAMPUAN BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DI INDONESIA DALAM PARADIGMA SUPPORTED DECISION MAKING","authors":"Puspaningtyas Panglipurjati","doi":"10.25170/paradigma.v6i02.2586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata regulates that an adult, who is in a continuous state of simple-mindedness, insanity or rage, shall be placed under conservatorship, notwithstanding that he might have mental capacity from time to time (mental disabilities). Similiar to that, Undang-Undang Penyandang Disabilitas regulates that people with disabilities can be declared as incapable of the law and placed under conservatorship by court judgment. The consequence of that conservatorship is an individual placed in conservatorship has no legal capacity and prohibited to do any legal action by themself. The perspective that be used in that two regulations and some court judgments in giving conservatorship is substituted decision making which the conservator substitutes the position of an individual placed in conservatorship. This concept actually is no longer appropriate with the new paradigm brought by CRPD, supported decision making. This issue makes the researcher did a normative research by using some secondary data as regulations and also some conservatorship court judgment. Based on the research, the researcher found that the regulations and some conservatorship court judgment do not support the efforts to fulfill the rights of person with disabilities to got an equality before the law especially to make any decisions. \n ","PeriodicalId":445925,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v6i02.2586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata regulates that an adult, who is in a continuous state of simple-mindedness, insanity or rage, shall be placed under conservatorship, notwithstanding that he might have mental capacity from time to time (mental disabilities). Similiar to that, Undang-Undang Penyandang Disabilitas regulates that people with disabilities can be declared as incapable of the law and placed under conservatorship by court judgment. The consequence of that conservatorship is an individual placed in conservatorship has no legal capacity and prohibited to do any legal action by themself. The perspective that be used in that two regulations and some court judgments in giving conservatorship is substituted decision making which the conservator substitutes the position of an individual placed in conservatorship. This concept actually is no longer appropriate with the new paradigm brought by CRPD, supported decision making. This issue makes the researcher did a normative research by using some secondary data as regulations and also some conservatorship court judgment. Based on the research, the researcher found that the regulations and some conservatorship court judgment do not support the efforts to fulfill the rights of person with disabilities to got an equality before the law especially to make any decisions.  
在印尼支持决策决策的范例中,对残疾管理和维护制度的研究进行了研究
《Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata》规定,对持续头脑简单、精神错乱或愤怒的成年人应予以监护,尽管他可能不时有精神能力(精神残疾)。与此类似,《Undang-Undang Penyandang Disabilitas》规定,残疾人可以被宣布为无法律行为能力,并由法院判决予以监护。这种监护的后果是被监护的个人没有法律行为能力,不能自行采取任何法律行动。在这两个条例和一些法院判决中使用的观点是替代决策,即保管人取代了被置于保管权中的个人的地位。这个概念实际上已经不再适合CRPD带来的新范式,支持决策。这一问题使得研究者利用一些二手资料作为规范,并结合一些托管法院的判决进行了规范性研究。在研究的基础上,研究人员发现,法规和一些监护法院的判决并不支持残疾人在法律面前获得平等的权利,特别是做出任何决定的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信