"Trolleyology" and autonomous vehicles - moral and legal questions on the application of the doctrine of double effect

Lea Pődör
{"title":"\"Trolleyology\" and autonomous vehicles - moral and legal questions on the application of the doctrine of double effect","authors":"Lea Pődör","doi":"10.25142/cep.2021.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on a classical problem of ethics and law: the doctrine of double effect (DDE). Nowadays the doctrine is more and more popular since AI-technology and superintelligent machines have been developing rapidly. Maybe autonomous vehicles’ most difficult dilemma is the following scenario: an autonomous car gets into an extreme road accident (collision) and the software should “decide” which direction-alternative to choose, but all of those possibilities end with death of human(s). This is a problem which requires a morally and legally justified answer. The principle emphasizes how to achieve a moral justification, what can be the classical cases of DDE and how to solve the most famous classical case, the trolley problem – which can be analogous to autonomous cars’ collisioncase. The paper also higlights whether the doctrine is relevant from the perspective of legal justification and legal solutions, too.","PeriodicalId":168251,"journal":{"name":"Central European Papers","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25142/cep.2021.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper focuses on a classical problem of ethics and law: the doctrine of double effect (DDE). Nowadays the doctrine is more and more popular since AI-technology and superintelligent machines have been developing rapidly. Maybe autonomous vehicles’ most difficult dilemma is the following scenario: an autonomous car gets into an extreme road accident (collision) and the software should “decide” which direction-alternative to choose, but all of those possibilities end with death of human(s). This is a problem which requires a morally and legally justified answer. The principle emphasizes how to achieve a moral justification, what can be the classical cases of DDE and how to solve the most famous classical case, the trolley problem – which can be analogous to autonomous cars’ collisioncase. The paper also higlights whether the doctrine is relevant from the perspective of legal justification and legal solutions, too.
“电车学”与自动驾驶汽车——双重效应理论应用中的道德与法律问题
本文关注的是伦理与法律的一个经典问题:双重效应学说。如今,随着人工智能技术和超智能机器的迅速发展,这一学说越来越流行。也许自动驾驶汽车最困难的困境是以下场景:一辆自动驾驶汽车陷入了一场极端的道路事故(碰撞),软件应该“决定”选择哪个方向,但所有这些可能性都以人类的死亡而告终。这是一个问题,需要一个道德上和法律上合理的答案。该原则强调如何实现道德辩护,什么是DDE的经典案例,以及如何解决最著名的经典案例,电车问题,它可以类似于自动驾驶汽车的碰撞案例。本文还从法律正当性和法律解决的角度对该学说是否具有相关性进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信