{"title":"About the Poetics of Sergey Rafalsky","authors":"","doi":"10.35785/2072-9464-2022-60-4-5-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article the author proves that the habit of researching the poetry by Sergey Rafalsky in the traditions of the Prague group «Skete of Poets» needs revising, because the poet emphasized his disagreements with the creative practice of that group and its leader A. Bem repeatedly. The author identifies some features, that indicate how the artistic credo of the «Paris note» influenced the poetics by Rafalsky, and notices the specificity, that allows us to speak about Rafalsky’s succession to G. Ivanov and G. Adamovich. The author analyses the poems, in which Rafalsky demonstrates implicitly his solidarity with the criteria \nof the genuine poetry in G. Adamovich’s comprehension and attempts to reconstruct intonations of conversational natural speech as adequately as possible, with its fragmentariness, understatement and incomplete information. All these \nfeatures were intrinsic to the poets of the «Paris note». The author proves that the poems of Rafalsky’s late period ought to be analysed in the context of the creative quests of the poets of Russian Montparnasse, although the influence of the avantgarde poetics is still strong in them. One of the reasons of such esemblance is an intonation dominant of the poetry of Rafalsky, who makes the most of Lermontov's and Blok's legacy in this aspect. Both of these poets were the gold standard for \nthe poets of the «Paris note», as well as G. Ivanov","PeriodicalId":211127,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2022-60-4-5-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the article the author proves that the habit of researching the poetry by Sergey Rafalsky in the traditions of the Prague group «Skete of Poets» needs revising, because the poet emphasized his disagreements with the creative practice of that group and its leader A. Bem repeatedly. The author identifies some features, that indicate how the artistic credo of the «Paris note» influenced the poetics by Rafalsky, and notices the specificity, that allows us to speak about Rafalsky’s succession to G. Ivanov and G. Adamovich. The author analyses the poems, in which Rafalsky demonstrates implicitly his solidarity with the criteria
of the genuine poetry in G. Adamovich’s comprehension and attempts to reconstruct intonations of conversational natural speech as adequately as possible, with its fragmentariness, understatement and incomplete information. All these
features were intrinsic to the poets of the «Paris note». The author proves that the poems of Rafalsky’s late period ought to be analysed in the context of the creative quests of the poets of Russian Montparnasse, although the influence of the avantgarde poetics is still strong in them. One of the reasons of such esemblance is an intonation dominant of the poetry of Rafalsky, who makes the most of Lermontov's and Blok's legacy in this aspect. Both of these poets were the gold standard for
the poets of the «Paris note», as well as G. Ivanov
在本文中,作者证明了谢尔盖·拉法尔斯基(Sergey Rafalsky)在布拉格“诗人之家”(Skete of Poets)团体的传统中研究诗歌的习惯需要修正,因为这位诗人一再强调他对该团体及其领导人A. Bem的创作实践持不同意见。作者确定了一些特征,表明“巴黎笔记”的艺术信条如何影响拉法尔斯基的诗学,并注意到特殊性,这使我们能够谈论拉法尔斯基对G.伊万诺夫和G.阿达莫维奇的继承。作者分析了这些诗歌,在这些诗歌中,拉法尔斯基含蓄地表明了他与阿达莫维奇理解的真正诗歌标准的一致,并试图尽可能充分地重建会话自然语言的语调,其片段性,轻描淡写和不完整的信息。所有这些特征都是“巴黎笔记”的诗人所固有的。作者认为,拉法尔斯基晚期诗歌虽然受到先锋派诗学的影响,但仍应放在俄国蒙帕纳斯派诗人创作追求的背景中加以分析。这种相似的原因之一是拉法尔斯基诗歌的语调占主导地位,他充分利用了莱蒙托夫和布洛克在这方面的遗产。这两位诗人都是“巴黎笔记”诗人的黄金标准,以及G.伊万诺夫