Labour Scarcity and Farm Mechanisation: A Cross State Comparison

A Amarender A. Reddy, Radhika Rani, G. Reddy
{"title":"Labour Scarcity and Farm Mechanisation: A Cross State Comparison","authors":"A Amarender A. Reddy, Radhika Rani, G. Reddy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2666935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper has analysed the trends in labour use (casual labour and family labour), machine use and labour productivity for five major crops namely, paddy, wheat, cotton, sugarcane and chickpea in the major states. The paper test the hypothesis that there are significant changes in the labour use, farm mechanisation and labour productivity across the states and crops by using the data collected from comprehensive cost of cultivation scheme for the period 1997 to 2010. The labour use per hectare decreased mainly in wheat, chickpea and paddy. The farm mechanisation is speeded up replacing both human and bullock capital. This transformation started in Punjab and Haryana and spread to other states. It increased labour productivity significantly when compared to land productivity. There is also a process of casualisation of agricultural labour as reflected in the increased share of casual labour in states like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, Maharashtra, Punjab, Gujarat and Haryana. However, in most of the crops in Orissa, West Bengal and in some crops in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan still the share of family labour is high with low level of farm mechanisation and less labour productivity which reflects the prevalence of subsistence agriculture. The positive association among farm mechanisation, displacement of family labour and increased casualisation of labour is observed across many states and crops. Some less developed states are catching up in the process. In this process, there is a steep increase in the labour productivity in agriculture, but the growth rates in wage rates are not commensurate with labour productivity growth. There is huge labour productivity gap that exists across the states with Punjab and Haryana leading with Madhya Pradesh and Orissa at the lower level","PeriodicalId":107048,"journal":{"name":"Food Industry eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Industry eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The paper has analysed the trends in labour use (casual labour and family labour), machine use and labour productivity for five major crops namely, paddy, wheat, cotton, sugarcane and chickpea in the major states. The paper test the hypothesis that there are significant changes in the labour use, farm mechanisation and labour productivity across the states and crops by using the data collected from comprehensive cost of cultivation scheme for the period 1997 to 2010. The labour use per hectare decreased mainly in wheat, chickpea and paddy. The farm mechanisation is speeded up replacing both human and bullock capital. This transformation started in Punjab and Haryana and spread to other states. It increased labour productivity significantly when compared to land productivity. There is also a process of casualisation of agricultural labour as reflected in the increased share of casual labour in states like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, Maharashtra, Punjab, Gujarat and Haryana. However, in most of the crops in Orissa, West Bengal and in some crops in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan still the share of family labour is high with low level of farm mechanisation and less labour productivity which reflects the prevalence of subsistence agriculture. The positive association among farm mechanisation, displacement of family labour and increased casualisation of labour is observed across many states and crops. Some less developed states are catching up in the process. In this process, there is a steep increase in the labour productivity in agriculture, but the growth rates in wage rates are not commensurate with labour productivity growth. There is huge labour productivity gap that exists across the states with Punjab and Haryana leading with Madhya Pradesh and Orissa at the lower level
劳动力短缺与农业机械化:跨州比较
本文分析了主要邦的五种主要作物,即水稻、小麦、棉花、甘蔗和鹰嘴豆的劳动力使用(临时工和家庭劳动力)、机器使用和劳动生产率的趋势。本文通过使用1997年至2010年期间从综合种植成本计划中收集的数据,检验了各州和作物在劳动力使用、农业机械化和劳动生产率方面存在重大变化的假设。每公顷劳动力使用量减少的主要是小麦、鹰嘴豆和水稻。农业机械化加速取代人力资本和牛资本。这种转变始于旁遮普和哈里亚纳邦,并蔓延到其他邦。与土地生产率相比,它显著提高了劳动生产率。安得拉邦、卡纳塔克邦、泰米尔纳德邦、比哈尔邦、马哈拉施特拉邦、旁遮普邦、古吉拉特邦和哈里亚纳邦等邦的临时工比例增加,也反映了农业劳动力的临时工化过程。然而,在奥里萨邦、西孟加拉邦的大多数作物以及北方邦、中央邦和拉贾斯坦邦的一些作物中,家庭劳动的比例仍然很高,农业机械化水平低,劳动生产率较低,这反映了自给农业的普遍存在。在许多州和作物中都观察到农业机械化、家庭劳动力流离失所和劳动力临时工增加之间的积极联系。一些欠发达的州正在迎头赶上。在这一过程中,农业劳动生产率急剧提高,但工资率的增长速度与劳动生产率的增长速度不相称。各邦之间存在巨大的劳动生产率差距,旁遮普邦和哈里亚纳邦领先,中央邦和奥里萨邦处于较低水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信