A study on Rh incompatibility and frequency of weak D among blood donors and patients at a tertiary care referral teaching hospital in Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

G. Krishna, K. S. Babu, R. Arun, D. Jothibai
{"title":"A study on Rh incompatibility and frequency of weak D among blood donors and patients at a tertiary care referral teaching hospital in Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh","authors":"G. Krishna, K. S. Babu, R. Arun, D. Jothibai","doi":"10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.14.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rh D antigen is the next most important after ABO antigens in the field of transfusion medicine. Weak D refers to reduced expression of D antigen on the red blood cell that requires an extended testing with indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) to get detected. Clinical importance of weak D arises when labelling the donor and patient, as the donor is labelled as D positive, patient as D negative. \nMethods: In our center all blood donor and patient samples are tested for ABO and Rh D by conventional tube technique using two anti-D reagents; anti-D immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal and a blend of anti-D IgM and immunoglobulin G (IgG). The blood samples which were negative for agglutination by immediate spin method were further tested for weak-D using IgG anti-D in the IAT phase with low ionic strength solution (LISS)/Coombs’gel card. \nResults: A total of 46,654 blood samples were tested (22,326 donors and 24,328 patients) during the period January 2012 to August 2014. Among these 43,771 (93.82%) were Rh D positive and remaining 2,883 (6.18%) were Rh-D negative. A total of 30 individuals (16 donors and 14 patients) were weak D positive constituting 1.04% of Rh-D negatives and 0.06% of total individuals screened. \nConclusions: This study shows the prevalence of weak D antigen in our population who are representative of Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh. It also stresses the need to identify individuals with variant D (rather than weak or partial D) and to inform them about their status as donor and recipient of blood/organ.","PeriodicalId":405143,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.14.053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Rh D antigen is the next most important after ABO antigens in the field of transfusion medicine. Weak D refers to reduced expression of D antigen on the red blood cell that requires an extended testing with indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) to get detected. Clinical importance of weak D arises when labelling the donor and patient, as the donor is labelled as D positive, patient as D negative. Methods: In our center all blood donor and patient samples are tested for ABO and Rh D by conventional tube technique using two anti-D reagents; anti-D immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal and a blend of anti-D IgM and immunoglobulin G (IgG). The blood samples which were negative for agglutination by immediate spin method were further tested for weak-D using IgG anti-D in the IAT phase with low ionic strength solution (LISS)/Coombs’gel card. Results: A total of 46,654 blood samples were tested (22,326 donors and 24,328 patients) during the period January 2012 to August 2014. Among these 43,771 (93.82%) were Rh D positive and remaining 2,883 (6.18%) were Rh-D negative. A total of 30 individuals (16 donors and 14 patients) were weak D positive constituting 1.04% of Rh-D negatives and 0.06% of total individuals screened. Conclusions: This study shows the prevalence of weak D antigen in our population who are representative of Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh. It also stresses the need to identify individuals with variant D (rather than weak or partial D) and to inform them about their status as donor and recipient of blood/organ.
安得拉邦蒂鲁帕蒂一家三级转诊教学医院献血者和患者Rh不相容及弱D频率的研究
背景:Rh D抗原是输血医学领域中仅次于ABO抗原的重要抗原。弱D是指D抗原在红细胞上的表达减少,需要通过间接抗球蛋白试验(IAT)进行扩展检测才能检测到。弱D的临床重要性在标记供体和患者时出现,因为供体被标记为D阳性,患者被标记为D阴性。方法:本中心所有献血者和患者标本均采用常规试管技术,采用两种抗D试剂检测ABO和Rh D;抗d免疫球蛋白M (IgM)单克隆和抗d免疫球蛋白M与免疫球蛋白G (IgG)的混合。直接自旋法凝集阴性的血样,用低离子强度溶液(LISS)/库姆斯凝胶卡在IAT相进一步检测IgG抗d的弱- d水平。结果:2012年1月至2014年8月,共检测了46,654份血液样本(22,326名献血者和24,328名患者)。Rh-D阳性43771例(93.82%),Rh-D阴性2883例(6.18%)。共有30人(16名供者和14名患者)为弱D阳性,占Rh-D阴性的1.04%,占筛查总个体的0.06%。结论:本研究显示弱D抗原在安得拉邦拉亚拉西马地区具有代表性的人群中普遍存在。它还强调需要识别变异D(而不是弱D或部分D)个体,并告知他们作为血液/器官供体和受体的状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信