A study on Rh incompatibility and frequency of weak D among blood donors and patients at a tertiary care referral teaching hospital in Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh
{"title":"A study on Rh incompatibility and frequency of weak D among blood donors and patients at a tertiary care referral teaching hospital in Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh","authors":"G. Krishna, K. S. Babu, R. Arun, D. Jothibai","doi":"10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.14.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rh D antigen is the next most important after ABO antigens in the field of transfusion medicine. Weak D refers to reduced expression of D antigen on the red blood cell that requires an extended testing with indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) to get detected. Clinical importance of weak D arises when labelling the donor and patient, as the donor is labelled as D positive, patient as D negative. \nMethods: In our center all blood donor and patient samples are tested for ABO and Rh D by conventional tube technique using two anti-D reagents; anti-D immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal and a blend of anti-D IgM and immunoglobulin G (IgG). The blood samples which were negative for agglutination by immediate spin method were further tested for weak-D using IgG anti-D in the IAT phase with low ionic strength solution (LISS)/Coombs’gel card. \nResults: A total of 46,654 blood samples were tested (22,326 donors and 24,328 patients) during the period January 2012 to August 2014. Among these 43,771 (93.82%) were Rh D positive and remaining 2,883 (6.18%) were Rh-D negative. A total of 30 individuals (16 donors and 14 patients) were weak D positive constituting 1.04% of Rh-D negatives and 0.06% of total individuals screened. \nConclusions: This study shows the prevalence of weak D antigen in our population who are representative of Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh. It also stresses the need to identify individuals with variant D (rather than weak or partial D) and to inform them about their status as donor and recipient of blood/organ.","PeriodicalId":405143,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.14.053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background: Rh D antigen is the next most important after ABO antigens in the field of transfusion medicine. Weak D refers to reduced expression of D antigen on the red blood cell that requires an extended testing with indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) to get detected. Clinical importance of weak D arises when labelling the donor and patient, as the donor is labelled as D positive, patient as D negative.
Methods: In our center all blood donor and patient samples are tested for ABO and Rh D by conventional tube technique using two anti-D reagents; anti-D immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal and a blend of anti-D IgM and immunoglobulin G (IgG). The blood samples which were negative for agglutination by immediate spin method were further tested for weak-D using IgG anti-D in the IAT phase with low ionic strength solution (LISS)/Coombs’gel card.
Results: A total of 46,654 blood samples were tested (22,326 donors and 24,328 patients) during the period January 2012 to August 2014. Among these 43,771 (93.82%) were Rh D positive and remaining 2,883 (6.18%) were Rh-D negative. A total of 30 individuals (16 donors and 14 patients) were weak D positive constituting 1.04% of Rh-D negatives and 0.06% of total individuals screened.
Conclusions: This study shows the prevalence of weak D antigen in our population who are representative of Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh. It also stresses the need to identify individuals with variant D (rather than weak or partial D) and to inform them about their status as donor and recipient of blood/organ.