"Ductility of Column, Wall, and Beams--How Much is Enough?"

W. Corley
{"title":"\"Ductility of Column, Wall, and Beams--How Much is Enough?\"","authors":"W. Corley","doi":"10.14359/984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two hypothetical reinforced concrete buildings (one with special moment resisting frames and the other with structural walls) were designed. Using a time-history inelastic behavior approach, both buildings were analyzed. Drifts were determined for these structures when subjected to severe earthquakes similar to those expected in North America. In addition, drifts associated with an analysis based on ground motions measured for the 1985 Mexico City earthquake were also determined. Measured drifts from components detailed under 1990s North American code requirements are compared with calculated building drifts. These comparisons indicate that 1990s code requirements provide significantly more capacity than calculated to be needed for the structures and components considered. Finally, minimum drift requirements for components to be used in ductile frame buildings and in shear wall buildings are suggested.","PeriodicalId":305630,"journal":{"name":"SP-157: Recent Developments In Lateral Force Transfer In Buildings","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-157: Recent Developments In Lateral Force Transfer In Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Two hypothetical reinforced concrete buildings (one with special moment resisting frames and the other with structural walls) were designed. Using a time-history inelastic behavior approach, both buildings were analyzed. Drifts were determined for these structures when subjected to severe earthquakes similar to those expected in North America. In addition, drifts associated with an analysis based on ground motions measured for the 1985 Mexico City earthquake were also determined. Measured drifts from components detailed under 1990s North American code requirements are compared with calculated building drifts. These comparisons indicate that 1990s code requirements provide significantly more capacity than calculated to be needed for the structures and components considered. Finally, minimum drift requirements for components to be used in ductile frame buildings and in shear wall buildings are suggested.
“柱、墙和梁的延展性——多少才算足够?”
设计了两个假设的钢筋混凝土建筑(一个有特殊的抗弯矩框架,另一个有结构墙)。采用时程非弹性行为方法对这两座建筑进行了分析。这些结构在遭受类似于预计在北美发生的强烈地震时,会发生漂移。此外,还确定了与1985年墨西哥城地震测量的地面运动分析有关的漂移。根据20世纪90年代北美规范的要求,将构件的实测漂移与计算的建筑漂移进行了比较。这些比较表明,1990年代的代码要求提供的容量远远大于所考虑的结构和组件所需的计算容量。最后,提出了在延性框架建筑和剪力墙建筑中使用的构件的最小位移要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信