Variations and Extensions of Information Leakage Metrics with Applications to Privacy Problems with Imperfect Statistical Information

S. K. Sakib, G. Amariucai, Yong Guan
{"title":"Variations and Extensions of Information Leakage Metrics with Applications to Privacy Problems with Imperfect Statistical Information","authors":"S. K. Sakib, G. Amariucai, Yong Guan","doi":"10.1109/CSF57540.2023.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional information leakage metrics assume that an adversary has complete knowledge of the distribution of the mechanism used to disclose information correlated with the sensitive attributes of a system. The only uncertainty arises from the specific realizations that are drawn from this distribution. This assumption does not hold in various practical scenarios where an adversary usually lacks complete information about the joint statistics of the private, utility, and the disclosed data. As a result, the typical information leakage metrics fail to measure the leakage appropriately. In this paper, we introduce multiple new versions of the traditional information-theoretic leakage metrics, that aptly represent information leakage for an adversary who lacks complete knowledge of the joint data statistics, and we provide insights into the potential uses of each. We experiment on a real-world dataset to further demonstrate how the introduced leakage metrics compare with the conventional notions of leakage. Finally, we show how privacy-utility optimization problems can be formulated in this context, such that their solutions result in the optimal information disclosure mechanisms, for various applications.","PeriodicalId":179870,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 36th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 36th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF57540.2023.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The conventional information leakage metrics assume that an adversary has complete knowledge of the distribution of the mechanism used to disclose information correlated with the sensitive attributes of a system. The only uncertainty arises from the specific realizations that are drawn from this distribution. This assumption does not hold in various practical scenarios where an adversary usually lacks complete information about the joint statistics of the private, utility, and the disclosed data. As a result, the typical information leakage metrics fail to measure the leakage appropriately. In this paper, we introduce multiple new versions of the traditional information-theoretic leakage metrics, that aptly represent information leakage for an adversary who lacks complete knowledge of the joint data statistics, and we provide insights into the potential uses of each. We experiment on a real-world dataset to further demonstrate how the introduced leakage metrics compare with the conventional notions of leakage. Finally, we show how privacy-utility optimization problems can be formulated in this context, such that their solutions result in the optimal information disclosure mechanisms, for various applications.
信息泄漏度量的变化与扩展及其在不完全统计信息隐私问题中的应用
传统的信息泄漏度量假设攻击者完全了解用于披露与系统敏感属性相关的信息的机制的分布。唯一的不确定性来自于从这种分布中得出的具体实现。在各种实际场景中,这种假设并不成立,因为攻击者通常缺乏关于私有、公用事业和公开数据的联合统计信息的完整信息。因此,典型的信息泄漏度量标准无法适当地度量泄漏。在本文中,我们介绍了传统信息论泄漏度量的多个新版本,这些度量恰当地代表了缺乏完整联合数据统计知识的对手的信息泄漏,并且我们提供了对每个度量的潜在用途的见解。我们在一个真实的数据集上进行实验,以进一步证明所引入的泄漏度量与传统泄漏概念的比较。最后,我们展示了如何在这种情况下制定隐私效用优化问题,使其解决方案产生各种应用程序的最佳信息披露机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信