A Network-Based Importance Measurement Index for Bridge Security Risk Assessment and Prioritisation

Mehdi Dezfuli Nezhad, R. Raoufi, A. Dalvand
{"title":"A Network-Based Importance Measurement Index for Bridge Security Risk Assessment and Prioritisation","authors":"Mehdi Dezfuli Nezhad, R. Raoufi, A. Dalvand","doi":"10.7250/bjrbe.2022-17.549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the related literature, conventional approaches to assessing security risk and prioritising bridges have focused on unique characteristics. Although the unique characteristics appropriately reflect the economic and social consequences of failure, they neglect the consequences of a bridge failure at the network level. If network owners and operators prioritise bridges solely based on their unique characteristics, bridges with low object-level importance and high network-level importance have very low chances to get priority. In this paper, a bridge importance measurement index α(e) has been presented, prioritising bridges based on their unique characteristics, location and network topology. To describe how to use this index α(e), three numerical examples were provided. While the first example was related to a simple hypothetical network, the second and third examples were real networks related to the bridges of Wroclaw city. Using these examples, the results of bridge prioritisation obtained in the unique-characteristics-only state were compared to the state in which α(e) had been used. Results showed that considering the location of the bridge and the topological characteristics of the network change the bridges prioritisation. For instance, in the second example, it was observed that the use of the α(e), made bridge Bolesława Krzywoustego the essential bridge, while bridge Grunwaldzki was the essential bridge under the previous prioritisation made by researchers. However, the results of the third example showed that bridge Milenijny, which was considered the essential network bridge as stated in the previous prioritisation made by researchers, was again selected as the most critical bridge based on the α(e).","PeriodicalId":297140,"journal":{"name":"The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2022-17.549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the related literature, conventional approaches to assessing security risk and prioritising bridges have focused on unique characteristics. Although the unique characteristics appropriately reflect the economic and social consequences of failure, they neglect the consequences of a bridge failure at the network level. If network owners and operators prioritise bridges solely based on their unique characteristics, bridges with low object-level importance and high network-level importance have very low chances to get priority. In this paper, a bridge importance measurement index α(e) has been presented, prioritising bridges based on their unique characteristics, location and network topology. To describe how to use this index α(e), three numerical examples were provided. While the first example was related to a simple hypothetical network, the second and third examples were real networks related to the bridges of Wroclaw city. Using these examples, the results of bridge prioritisation obtained in the unique-characteristics-only state were compared to the state in which α(e) had been used. Results showed that considering the location of the bridge and the topological characteristics of the network change the bridges prioritisation. For instance, in the second example, it was observed that the use of the α(e), made bridge Bolesława Krzywoustego the essential bridge, while bridge Grunwaldzki was the essential bridge under the previous prioritisation made by researchers. However, the results of the third example showed that bridge Milenijny, which was considered the essential network bridge as stated in the previous prioritisation made by researchers, was again selected as the most critical bridge based on the α(e).
基于网络的桥梁安全风险评估与优先级排序重要性度量指标
在相关文献中,评估安全风险和对桥梁进行优先排序的传统方法侧重于独特的特征。虽然这些独特的特征恰当地反映了故障的经济和社会后果,但它们忽略了网络层面桥梁故障的后果。如果网络所有者和运营商仅仅根据桥梁的独特特征来对其进行优先级排序,那么对象级重要性低和网络级重要性高的桥梁获得优先级的机会非常低。本文提出了桥梁重要性度量指标α(e),根据桥梁的独特特性、位置和网络拓扑结构对桥梁进行排序。为了说明如何使用该指标α(e),给出了三个数值算例。第一个例子与一个简单的假设网络有关,第二个和第三个例子是与弗罗茨瓦夫市的桥梁有关的真实网络。通过这些例子,将在唯一特征状态下获得的桥优先级结果与使用α(e)的状态进行了比较。结果表明,考虑网桥的位置和网络的拓扑特性,可以改变网桥的优先级。例如,在第二个例子中,可以观察到,α(e)的使用使得Bolesława Krzywoustego桥成为必要的桥梁,而Grunwaldzki桥是研究人员先前优先级下的必要桥梁。然而,第三个例子的结果表明,Milenijny桥,被认为是必不可少的网络桥,正如研究人员在之前的优先级中所述,再次被选择为基于α(e)的最关键桥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信