Hybrid electric vehicle commercialization issues

L. Browning, S. Unnasch
{"title":"Hybrid electric vehicle commercialization issues","authors":"L. Browning, S. Unnasch","doi":"10.1109/BCAA.2001.905098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given, as follows. One of the largest issues in commercializing hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) is the cost and life of the batteries. This is particularly true with plug-in HEVs that can provide all-electric operation for a given range. In this study, various hybrid electric vehicle configurations were analyzed for battery size, cost and predicted battery life. Battery lifetimes were calculated based upon a deep-discharge model using various driving scenarios and charging frequencies. Two plug-in HEV models were considered, namely an HEV with a 20-mile all-electric range (HEV 20) and an HEV with a 60-mile all-electric range (HEV 60). Four \"real world\" driving schedules were analyzed based upon survey responses of approximately 400 drivers. The results from the survey were grouped by one-way daily commute distance. Total annual and all electric miles were calculated for each vehicle configuration and driving schedule, using the survey results. Using all-electric fuel economy and battery size calculated using the NREL ADVISOR model, battery energy use was calculated during each vehicle lifetime for each scenario. Using a deep-discharge model, the number of deep discharge cycles were calculated for each driving situation and vehicle configuration to determine the all-electric battery driving potential in terms of total vehicle miles and calendar years. Based upon the calculations, the HEV 20 had an all-electric battery driving potential of approximately 29000 all-electric miles before the battery degraded below 80% of its original capacity (assumed to occur after 1750 deep-discharge cycles). The HEV 60 had an all-electric battery driving potential of approximately 87000 all-electric miles. Because HEVs also use a gasoline engine to operate in a charge sustaining mode, this all-electric potential translated into 46000 to 174000 total vehicle miles for the HEV 20 and 104000 to 220000 total vehicle miles for the HEV 60, depending upon driving patterns and charging frequency. While in some cases, the HEV 20 might exceed its total battery all-electric driving potential during the vehicle lifetime, there are several methods to mitigate the need for battery replacement. These are explained in this paper. In the event battery replacement is needed, replacement costs are estimated under two commercial scenarios.","PeriodicalId":360008,"journal":{"name":"Sixteenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances. Proceedings of the Conference (Cat. No.01TH8533)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixteenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances. Proceedings of the Conference (Cat. No.01TH8533)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BCAA.2001.905098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Summary form only given, as follows. One of the largest issues in commercializing hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) is the cost and life of the batteries. This is particularly true with plug-in HEVs that can provide all-electric operation for a given range. In this study, various hybrid electric vehicle configurations were analyzed for battery size, cost and predicted battery life. Battery lifetimes were calculated based upon a deep-discharge model using various driving scenarios and charging frequencies. Two plug-in HEV models were considered, namely an HEV with a 20-mile all-electric range (HEV 20) and an HEV with a 60-mile all-electric range (HEV 60). Four "real world" driving schedules were analyzed based upon survey responses of approximately 400 drivers. The results from the survey were grouped by one-way daily commute distance. Total annual and all electric miles were calculated for each vehicle configuration and driving schedule, using the survey results. Using all-electric fuel economy and battery size calculated using the NREL ADVISOR model, battery energy use was calculated during each vehicle lifetime for each scenario. Using a deep-discharge model, the number of deep discharge cycles were calculated for each driving situation and vehicle configuration to determine the all-electric battery driving potential in terms of total vehicle miles and calendar years. Based upon the calculations, the HEV 20 had an all-electric battery driving potential of approximately 29000 all-electric miles before the battery degraded below 80% of its original capacity (assumed to occur after 1750 deep-discharge cycles). The HEV 60 had an all-electric battery driving potential of approximately 87000 all-electric miles. Because HEVs also use a gasoline engine to operate in a charge sustaining mode, this all-electric potential translated into 46000 to 174000 total vehicle miles for the HEV 20 and 104000 to 220000 total vehicle miles for the HEV 60, depending upon driving patterns and charging frequency. While in some cases, the HEV 20 might exceed its total battery all-electric driving potential during the vehicle lifetime, there are several methods to mitigate the need for battery replacement. These are explained in this paper. In the event battery replacement is needed, replacement costs are estimated under two commercial scenarios.
混合动力电动汽车商业化问题
仅给出摘要形式,如下。混合动力汽车(HEV)商业化的最大问题之一是电池的成本和寿命。对于可以在给定范围内提供全电动操作的插电式混合动力汽车来说尤其如此。在本研究中,分析了各种混合动力汽车配置的电池尺寸,成本和预测电池寿命。基于深度放电模型,在不同的驾驶场景和充电频率下计算电池寿命。研究人员考虑了两种插电式混合动力车型,即20英里纯电动续航里程(HEV 20)和60英里纯电动续航里程(HEV 60)的混合动力车型。根据对约400名司机的调查结果,分析了四种“现实世界”的驾驶时间表。调查结果按单程每日通勤距离分组。使用调查结果,计算了每种车辆配置和驾驶计划的年度总里程和所有电动里程。使用NREL ADVISOR模型计算的全电动燃油经济性和电池尺寸,计算了每种情况下每辆车寿命期间的电池能耗。采用深度放电模型,计算不同驾驶工况和车辆配置下的深度放电循环次数,以确定全电动电池在总行驶里程和日历年方面的行驶潜力。根据计算,HEV 20在电池退化到原始容量的80%以下(假设在1750次深放电循环后发生)之前,其全电动电池的行驶潜力约为29000英里。HEV 60的全电动续航里程约为87000英里。由于混合动力汽车也使用汽油发动机在充电持续模式下运行,因此根据驾驶模式和充电频率的不同,HEV 20的全电势转化为46000至174000总行驶里程,HEV 60的总行驶里程转化为104000至220000总行驶里程。虽然在某些情况下,HEV 20在车辆使用寿命期间可能会超过其全电池驱动潜力,但有几种方法可以减轻更换电池的需要。本文对此进行了说明。在需要更换电池的情况下,在两种商业场景下估计更换成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信