Paper vs. Computer: Are Printed Thermodynamic Property Tables Still Important

J. L. Krohn
{"title":"Paper vs. Computer: Are Printed Thermodynamic Property Tables Still Important","authors":"J. L. Krohn","doi":"10.18260/1-2-1153-38351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of computerized thermodynamics tables, students no longer necessarily need to learn the use of printed tables and the difficulties of interpolation. However, the question arises, at least in the author’s view, of whether full dependence on computerized tables removes the student further from a basic understanding of what the properties represent and what is a “reasonable” value for a particular property. As has been seen in other courses, the use of computerized thermodynamic property tables seems to lead to a “disconnect” between what the table values represent and the actual numbers obtained. In this extended abstract, observations from 20+ years of teaching thermodynamics using both paper and computerized property tables will be discussed and a possible framework for further investigation of the state question will be set forth. For of this study, the term thermodynamic tables is meant to refer to a computer program available to students in which thermodynamics properties at any virtually any combination of temperature and pressure (or other property combinations) can easily be found simply by typing in the known values. In reality, computerized thermodynamics tables have been in use since the 1960’s as the printed tables used in thermodynamics textbooks from that time forward have been based on a computer solution to a many variable fundamental thermodynamic function. when the author was an undergraduate student taking Thermodynamics I and II, along with the textbook, to obtain a copy of “Steam Tables” by Keenan, Keyes, Hill, and Moore 1 .","PeriodicalId":280607,"journal":{"name":"2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Proceedings","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-1153-38351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advent of computerized thermodynamics tables, students no longer necessarily need to learn the use of printed tables and the difficulties of interpolation. However, the question arises, at least in the author’s view, of whether full dependence on computerized tables removes the student further from a basic understanding of what the properties represent and what is a “reasonable” value for a particular property. As has been seen in other courses, the use of computerized thermodynamic property tables seems to lead to a “disconnect” between what the table values represent and the actual numbers obtained. In this extended abstract, observations from 20+ years of teaching thermodynamics using both paper and computerized property tables will be discussed and a possible framework for further investigation of the state question will be set forth. For of this study, the term thermodynamic tables is meant to refer to a computer program available to students in which thermodynamics properties at any virtually any combination of temperature and pressure (or other property combinations) can easily be found simply by typing in the known values. In reality, computerized thermodynamics tables have been in use since the 1960’s as the printed tables used in thermodynamics textbooks from that time forward have been based on a computer solution to a many variable fundamental thermodynamic function. when the author was an undergraduate student taking Thermodynamics I and II, along with the textbook, to obtain a copy of “Steam Tables” by Keenan, Keyes, Hill, and Moore 1 .
纸与计算机:打印的热力学性质表仍然重要吗
随着计算机热力学表的出现,学生们不再需要学习打印表格的使用和插值的困难。然而,问题出现了,至少在作者看来,完全依赖计算机表格是否会使学生进一步远离对属性代表什么以及特定属性的“合理”值的基本理解。正如在其他课程中所看到的那样,计算机化热力学性质表的使用似乎导致了表值与实际得到的数字之间的“脱节”。在这个扩展的摘要中,将讨论20多年来使用纸上和计算机性质表教学热力学的观察结果,并提出进一步研究状态问题的可能框架。在本研究中,热力学表一词指的是学生可以使用的一种计算机程序,在该程序中,只要输入已知值,就可以很容易地找到几乎任何温度和压力组合(或其他属性组合)下的热力学属性。实际上,计算机热力学表从20世纪60年代就开始使用了,因为从那时起,热力学教科书中使用的印刷表都是基于计算机对许多变量基本热力学函数的解决方案。当作者还是一名本科生时,为了获得Keenan, Keyes, Hill和Moore编写的“蒸汽表”,除了教科书之外,还选修了热力学I和II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信