Supremacy of Parliament Undermined by Irregular Promulgation of Ordinances (A Case Study with Reference to Pakistan)

A. Usman, Amjad M. Hussain, Ms. Farah Amir
{"title":"Supremacy of Parliament Undermined by Irregular Promulgation of Ordinances (A Case Study with Reference to Pakistan)","authors":"A. Usman, Amjad M. Hussain, Ms. Farah Amir","doi":"10.52279/jlss.04.03.393408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pakistan claims to have parliamentary system of government under the Constitution of Pakistan 1973. First constituent assembly introduced a marvelous accumulation of supremacy of Islamic principles within the Constitutional framework based on ideology of liberation movement. The principles of this ideology have been given an overwhelming space in the preamble of Constitution. This claim boosted expectations of the nation to work out a political heritage of faith blended with proceeds of modern popular democratic culture. The governing system of State which had to strictly follow the Constitutional ideals seems to have misplaced its direction. It is in similarity of the colonial system against people struggled for their independence. Several reasons of failure have been alleged but the real cause is having no adherence for principles which the constituent assembly framed for the State Constitution. Resultantly, Constitutions of State (for no reason) were abrogated and held in abeyance twice under the executive decree. Dictatorial regimes promulgated series of irregular Ordinances and Provisional (un)Constitutional Orders. People and institutions needlessly were blamed for failure. State system took refuge in promulgation of Ordinances and autocratic Constitutional orders. Most of the Ordinances were used to implement arbitrary administrative actions and were given the colour of royal decree. Several Ordinances are being enforced regardless of their theoretical characteristics. This is reducing the parliamentary legislation inflicting serious blow to the grooming structure of State. The constitutionality of these Ordinances is still in question in superior courts. This study intends to determine the consequences of such extra-constitutional practices and the dimensions of loss to political system of State. The doctrinal method of research was adopted to conduct the study.","PeriodicalId":292498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law & Social Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law & Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52279/jlss.04.03.393408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pakistan claims to have parliamentary system of government under the Constitution of Pakistan 1973. First constituent assembly introduced a marvelous accumulation of supremacy of Islamic principles within the Constitutional framework based on ideology of liberation movement. The principles of this ideology have been given an overwhelming space in the preamble of Constitution. This claim boosted expectations of the nation to work out a political heritage of faith blended with proceeds of modern popular democratic culture. The governing system of State which had to strictly follow the Constitutional ideals seems to have misplaced its direction. It is in similarity of the colonial system against people struggled for their independence. Several reasons of failure have been alleged but the real cause is having no adherence for principles which the constituent assembly framed for the State Constitution. Resultantly, Constitutions of State (for no reason) were abrogated and held in abeyance twice under the executive decree. Dictatorial regimes promulgated series of irregular Ordinances and Provisional (un)Constitutional Orders. People and institutions needlessly were blamed for failure. State system took refuge in promulgation of Ordinances and autocratic Constitutional orders. Most of the Ordinances were used to implement arbitrary administrative actions and were given the colour of royal decree. Several Ordinances are being enforced regardless of their theoretical characteristics. This is reducing the parliamentary legislation inflicting serious blow to the grooming structure of State. The constitutionality of these Ordinances is still in question in superior courts. This study intends to determine the consequences of such extra-constitutional practices and the dimensions of loss to political system of State. The doctrinal method of research was adopted to conduct the study.
不规范颁布法令损害议会至高无上地位(以巴基斯坦为例)
巴基斯坦声称根据1973年巴基斯坦宪法实行议会制政府。第一次制宪会议在基于解放运动意识形态的宪法框架内引入了伊斯兰原则至高无上的惊人积累。这一意识形态的原则在《宪法》的序言中占据了压倒性的篇幅。这一主张提高了人们对这个国家建立一种融合了现代大众民主文化成果的信仰政治遗产的期望。必须严格遵循宪法理想的国家管理制度似乎迷失了方向。这与殖民制度对争取独立的人民的打击是相似的。有人提出了失败的几个原因,但真正的原因是没有遵守制宪会议为国家宪法制定的原则。结果,《国家宪法》在行政命令下被(无缘无故地)废除和搁置了两次。独裁政权颁布了一系列不正规的条例和临时(非)宪制命令。人们和机构被不必要地归咎于失败。国家制度在颁布法令和专制的宪法命令中得到庇护。大多数法令被用来实施任意的行政行为,并被赋予皇家法令的色彩。有几项条例不论其理论特点如何都在执行。这正在减少议会立法,对国家的培训结构造成严重打击。这些条例是否合宪性仍在高等法院受到质疑。这项研究的目的是确定这种违反宪法的做法的后果以及对国家政治制度造成损失的各个方面。采用理论研究方法进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信