{"title":"The Right to Autonomy as a Moral Foundation for the Realization Principle in Income Taxation","authors":"C. Delmotte","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.","PeriodicalId":175866,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Political Processes","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Political Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198798439.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This chapter supplements the debate on the ideal capital gains tax through its examination of a suitable technique for assessing income. On the one hand, assets can be taxed according to the annual increase in market value (the mark-to-market approach). On the other hand, the taxation of capital can be imposed on the income that one realizes from one’ s assets-such as the monetary benefits received in exchange for a transfer of property (the realization approach). Importantly, tax scholars quasi-unanimously decry the former practice in terms of equity and efficiency. Theoretically, the (diminishing) acceptance of the taxation of realized gains is merely founded on pragmatic concerns. By delivering a deontological defense of the realization principle, this chapter establishes a possible normative foundation for this theoretically denounced practice, and supplements the debate on tax reform by suggesting the promotion of efficiency or financial redistribution in an autonomy-friendly fashion.