SELF-REVIEW OF PARENTING STYLES: Experiences in a group of socially vulnerable mothers in Northern Brazil

R. Darwich, Ana Letícia Nunes
{"title":"SELF-REVIEW OF PARENTING STYLES: Experiences in a group of socially vulnerable mothers in Northern Brazil","authors":"R. Darwich, Ana Letícia Nunes","doi":"10.36315/2020inpact065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thisstudy presents a group intervention with mothers of children fromsix to twelveyears old in a situation of socialvulnerability. Weaimed to encouragethe participants to identifythe parenting style they adoptand alternatives for action, totest changes in behavior between group meetings and toevaluate the results of their efforts. Thefieldresearch describedcorresponds to one of the focus groups created in2018 in the contextofan action research implemented at the University ofAmazônia(UNAMA), Belém, located in northern Brazil. We selected five participants who were present in atleast 60% of the ten weekly meetings. Verbal exchanges in meetings and individual interviews supported the formation of analysis categories corresponding to three parenting styles: authoritative or democratic, authoritarian,and permissive. The Social Skills Rating System -Brazilian version (SSRS)and a secondindividual interview were applied attheend of the meetings. We have verified changes towardsthe adoption of an authoritative parenting style, whichgenerated positive impacts onfamily relationships. Social skills led to developments in the behavior ofchildren at school, indicating that it is a way to overcome the situation of social vulnerability in which they find themselves.","PeriodicalId":196737,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Psychology and Psychological Trends","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Psychology and Psychological Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2020inpact065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thisstudy presents a group intervention with mothers of children fromsix to twelveyears old in a situation of socialvulnerability. Weaimed to encouragethe participants to identifythe parenting style they adoptand alternatives for action, totest changes in behavior between group meetings and toevaluate the results of their efforts. Thefieldresearch describedcorresponds to one of the focus groups created in2018 in the contextofan action research implemented at the University ofAmazônia(UNAMA), Belém, located in northern Brazil. We selected five participants who were present in atleast 60% of the ten weekly meetings. Verbal exchanges in meetings and individual interviews supported the formation of analysis categories corresponding to three parenting styles: authoritative or democratic, authoritarian,and permissive. The Social Skills Rating System -Brazilian version (SSRS)and a secondindividual interview were applied attheend of the meetings. We have verified changes towardsthe adoption of an authoritative parenting style, whichgenerated positive impacts onfamily relationships. Social skills led to developments in the behavior ofchildren at school, indicating that it is a way to overcome the situation of social vulnerability in which they find themselves.
教养方式的自我检讨:巴西北部一群社会弱势母亲的经验
本研究以六至十二岁儿童的母亲为研究对象,对其社会脆弱状况进行小组干预。我们的目的是鼓励参与者确定他们采用的养育方式和行动的替代方案,测试小组会议之间行为的变化,并评估他们努力的结果。所描述的实地研究与2018年在位于巴西北部贝尔萨姆的大学ofAmazônia(联阿援助团)实施的行动研究背景下创建的焦点小组之一相对应。我们选择了五名参与者,他们至少参加了十次每周会议的60%。会议和个人访谈中的口头交流支持了与三种养育方式相对应的分析类别的形成:权威或民主,专制和宽容。在会议结束时,采用了巴西版社会技能评分系统(SSRS)和第二次个人面试。我们已经证实了采用权威型育儿方式的变化,这对家庭关系产生了积极的影响。社交技能导致儿童在学校行为的发展,表明这是一种克服他们发现自己的社会脆弱性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信