S12.2 Type I interferons and their autoantibodies in the context of systemic lupus erythematosus

L. Haljasmägi, H. Bradford, M. Menon, P. Peterson, M. Vanker, C. Wincup, V. Bondet, D. Duffy, D. Isenberg, K. Kisand, C. Mauri
{"title":"S12.2 Type I interferons and their autoantibodies in the context of systemic lupus erythematosus","authors":"L. Haljasmägi, H. Bradford, M. Menon, P. Peterson, M. Vanker, C. Wincup, V. Bondet, D. Duffy, D. Isenberg, K. Kisand, C. Mauri","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2022-elm2022.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeType I IFNs and their autoantibodies are implicated in the pathogenesis of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but their incidence and importance is still unclear. Neutralizing autoantibodies against IFNα have been previously reported in patients with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy syndrome type I (APS-1), rheumatoid arthritis, thymoma and more recently life-threatening COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that autoantibodies towards type I IFNs, that develop in some patients with SLE, are neutralizing and may interfere with the course of the disease.MethodsLuciferase immunoprecipitation (LIPS) analysis was used to screen 474 SLE patient and 312 control serum samples for the presence of IFNα binding autoantibodies and determine their subclasses. Type I IFN neutralizing capacity was tested using a reporter cell line. Circulating levels of IFNα were measured with Single Molecule Array (Simoa).Results14% of SLE patients were positive for anti-IFNα and 13% were positive for anti-IFNω. The autoantibodies against IFNα were predominantly of IgG1 subclass and neutralized IFNα bioactivity in approximately one half of the positive cases. Once developed, anti-IFNα autoantibodies were present throughout the disease course. IFNα2 and -α8 were targeted first in two informative follow-up cases. The reactivity broadened to other IFNα subtypes and IFNω within several months. Serum levels of IFNα correlated negatively with anti-IFNα neutralizing titers. Patients with high levels of autoantibodies against IFNα had significantly lower levels of circulating IFNα compared to anti-IFNα negative patients. Interestingly, patients with high IFNα neutralizing capacity displayed significantly lower disease activity than patients without these autoantibodies.ConclusionsBased on our results we suggest that autoantibodies that are able to neutralize the circulating levels of all IFNα subtypes may have a beneficial effect to SLE disease course.","PeriodicalId":363462,"journal":{"name":"Thursday 06 October 2022 from 17:30 to 19:00","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thursday 06 October 2022 from 17:30 to 19:00","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2022-elm2022.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeType I IFNs and their autoantibodies are implicated in the pathogenesis of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but their incidence and importance is still unclear. Neutralizing autoantibodies against IFNα have been previously reported in patients with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy syndrome type I (APS-1), rheumatoid arthritis, thymoma and more recently life-threatening COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that autoantibodies towards type I IFNs, that develop in some patients with SLE, are neutralizing and may interfere with the course of the disease.MethodsLuciferase immunoprecipitation (LIPS) analysis was used to screen 474 SLE patient and 312 control serum samples for the presence of IFNα binding autoantibodies and determine their subclasses. Type I IFN neutralizing capacity was tested using a reporter cell line. Circulating levels of IFNα were measured with Single Molecule Array (Simoa).Results14% of SLE patients were positive for anti-IFNα and 13% were positive for anti-IFNω. The autoantibodies against IFNα were predominantly of IgG1 subclass and neutralized IFNα bioactivity in approximately one half of the positive cases. Once developed, anti-IFNα autoantibodies were present throughout the disease course. IFNα2 and -α8 were targeted first in two informative follow-up cases. The reactivity broadened to other IFNα subtypes and IFNω within several months. Serum levels of IFNα correlated negatively with anti-IFNα neutralizing titers. Patients with high levels of autoantibodies against IFNα had significantly lower levels of circulating IFNα compared to anti-IFNα negative patients. Interestingly, patients with high IFNα neutralizing capacity displayed significantly lower disease activity than patients without these autoantibodies.ConclusionsBased on our results we suggest that autoantibodies that are able to neutralize the circulating levels of all IFNα subtypes may have a beneficial effect to SLE disease course.
S12.2 I型干扰素及其自身抗体在系统性红斑狼疮中的作用
目的I型ifn及其自身抗体与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的发病机制有关,但其发病率和重要性尚不清楚。针对IFNα的中和性自身抗体先前在自身免疫性多内分泌病变综合征I型(APS-1)、类风湿性关节炎、胸腺瘤和最近危及生命的COVID-19患者中有报道。我们假设在一些SLE患者中出现的针对I型ifn的自身抗体是中和性的,并且可能干扰疾病的进程。方法采用荧光素酶免疫沉淀法(LIPS)筛选474例SLE患者和312例对照血清中IFNα结合自身抗体的存在并确定其亚类。使用报告细胞系检测I型IFN中和能力。采用单分子阵列(Simoa)检测IFNα循环水平。结果14% SLE患者抗ifn α阳性,13% SLE患者抗ifn ω阳性。抗IFNα的自身抗体主要是IgG1亚类,在大约一半的阳性病例中中和了IFNα的生物活性。一旦发展,抗ifn α自身抗体在整个病程中都存在。在两例信息丰富的随访病例中,首先靶向IFNα2和-α8。在几个月内,反应性扩大到其他IFNα亚型和IFNω。血清IFNα水平与抗IFNα中和效价呈负相关。与抗IFNα阴性的患者相比,具有高水平IFNα自身抗体的患者循环IFNα水平显著降低。有趣的是,与没有这些自身抗体的患者相比,具有高ifn - α中和能力的患者表现出明显较低的疾病活动性。基于我们的研究结果,我们认为能够中和循环中所有IFNα亚型水平的自身抗体可能对SLE病程有有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信