Controlling discrete manufacturing processes using Kanban and Heijunka approaches

T. Runkler
{"title":"Controlling discrete manufacturing processes using Kanban and Heijunka approaches","authors":"T. Runkler","doi":"10.1109/INDIN.2011.6034859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the control of discrete manufacturing processes whose individual manufacturing units are able to produce components of different types that are stored in separate buffers. One of the standard control methods for such processes uses the so-called Kanban scheme, where the currently produced type is only switched when one of the buffers is about to run empty. Recently, an alternative method started to receive increasing attention: the so-called Heijunka scheme that realizes strictly periodic schedules. We compare both methods and apply them to a simplified manufacturing process that mimics a real-world process at an electronic circuit board manufacturer. The experiments show that Kanban is very well suited for the startup phase of the process, because no knowledge about the expected process statistics is required, the buffer levels are lower, and the maximum ability to deliver is reached much faster than with the Heijunka method. After the startup phase, however, the experiments indicate that Heijunka is preferable, because then it yields lower buffer levels and higher average ability to deliver than Kanban. Thus, the optimal control strategy for the type of manufacturing processes under investigation initially uses Kanban and then switches over to Heijunka.","PeriodicalId":378407,"journal":{"name":"2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2011.6034859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This paper deals with the control of discrete manufacturing processes whose individual manufacturing units are able to produce components of different types that are stored in separate buffers. One of the standard control methods for such processes uses the so-called Kanban scheme, where the currently produced type is only switched when one of the buffers is about to run empty. Recently, an alternative method started to receive increasing attention: the so-called Heijunka scheme that realizes strictly periodic schedules. We compare both methods and apply them to a simplified manufacturing process that mimics a real-world process at an electronic circuit board manufacturer. The experiments show that Kanban is very well suited for the startup phase of the process, because no knowledge about the expected process statistics is required, the buffer levels are lower, and the maximum ability to deliver is reached much faster than with the Heijunka method. After the startup phase, however, the experiments indicate that Heijunka is preferable, because then it yields lower buffer levels and higher average ability to deliver than Kanban. Thus, the optimal control strategy for the type of manufacturing processes under investigation initially uses Kanban and then switches over to Heijunka.
使用看板和平实化方法控制离散制造过程
本文讨论了离散制造过程的控制问题,离散制造过程中的单个制造单元能够生产存储在单独缓冲区中的不同类型的部件。这类过程的标准控制方法之一是使用所谓的看板方案,即只有当其中一个缓冲区即将耗尽时,才切换当前生成的类型。最近,另一种方法开始受到越来越多的关注:所谓的Heijunka方案,它严格实现周期性时间表。我们比较了这两种方法,并将它们应用到一个简化的制造过程中,该过程模仿了电子电路板制造商的真实过程。实验表明,看板非常适合于流程的启动阶段,因为不需要了解预期的流程统计数据,缓冲级别较低,并且比Heijunka方法更快地达到最大交付能力。然而,在启动阶段之后,实验表明平装板更可取,因为它比看板产生更低的缓冲水平和更高的平均交付能力。因此,所研究的制造过程类型的最优控制策略最初使用看板,然后切换到平实化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信