A Method of Performance Evaluation for Engineers and Scientists

Abstract

This paper deals with the development, installation and testing of a Dual Evaluation Method of performance rating as applied to the engineers and scientists engaged in research activities in a laboratory operated by an academic institution. To study the use of performance rating plans in representative organizations, a questionnaire was sent to 175 organizations through-out the country. Concurrently, a series of meetings was held within the Laboratory with research administrators, supervisors, and scientists; recommendations for further investigation and experimentation resulted. A committee of research personnel was set up to assist in the design of an evaluation program. It reviewed four types of plans: Factor-Type Plan, Narrative Plan by the Supervisor, Personal Review Form, and Coaching Plan. Suggestions of the committee provided the basis for developing a new plan. A method was established whereby the engineer rates himself on a factor-type form before the actual interview with his supervisor. This preview prepares him for the interview knowing by what factors he has been evaluated. Because of this, he is better prepared to discuss the rating with his supervisor. The new plan was designed with two distinct but related sections. The first, Job Performance Appraisal, was to be the evaluation of how well an individual was doing on his present job. Second, was the Academic Development Inventory which was to be a record of the contributions which lead to promotion in rank and the granting of tenure.