A preliminary study of different metrics for the validation of device and behavioral models

M. Pirazzini, G. Fernandez, A. Alabadelah, G. Vannini, M. Barciela, E. Sánchez, D. Schreurs
{"title":"A preliminary study of different metrics for the validation of device and behavioral models","authors":"M. Pirazzini, G. Fernandez, A. Alabadelah, G. Vannini, M. Barciela, E. Sánchez, D. Schreurs","doi":"10.1109/ARFTGS.2005.1500571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In integrated circuit and/or system design using CAD tools, model accuracy has obviously a direct impact on the quality of the final performance prediction. One of the most common ways to evaluate the quality of a model has always been the visual inspection of the comparison between simulations and measurements; the highest quality is assigned to the model that returns the set of curves closer to the measured ones. Unfortunately a large number of variables (bias, frequency, power level, large signal regime, etc.) may be of concern and, in such a case, it can be quite hard to decide which is the best model for a targeted application. Therefore, the problem of accuracy evaluation can be addressed by defining suitable \"metrics\", i.e., numerical formulae which return, possibly, dimensionless quantity as performance indexes for a model in term of best fitting between simulations and measurements. In this work several metrics have been studied from the model validation point of view. In particular, different metrics for DC characteristics, scattering parameters as well as large signal performance have been tested for HBT and NMOS transistor models, and for WCDMA base station LDMOS power amplifier models. Dis/Advantages of the proposed metrics and possible solutions/improvements are discussed.","PeriodicalId":148659,"journal":{"name":"65th ARFTG Conference Digest, 2005. Spring 2005","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"65th ARFTG Conference Digest, 2005. Spring 2005","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTGS.2005.1500571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In integrated circuit and/or system design using CAD tools, model accuracy has obviously a direct impact on the quality of the final performance prediction. One of the most common ways to evaluate the quality of a model has always been the visual inspection of the comparison between simulations and measurements; the highest quality is assigned to the model that returns the set of curves closer to the measured ones. Unfortunately a large number of variables (bias, frequency, power level, large signal regime, etc.) may be of concern and, in such a case, it can be quite hard to decide which is the best model for a targeted application. Therefore, the problem of accuracy evaluation can be addressed by defining suitable "metrics", i.e., numerical formulae which return, possibly, dimensionless quantity as performance indexes for a model in term of best fitting between simulations and measurements. In this work several metrics have been studied from the model validation point of view. In particular, different metrics for DC characteristics, scattering parameters as well as large signal performance have been tested for HBT and NMOS transistor models, and for WCDMA base station LDMOS power amplifier models. Dis/Advantages of the proposed metrics and possible solutions/improvements are discussed.
设备和行为模型验证的不同度量的初步研究
在使用CAD工具进行集成电路和/或系统设计时,模型精度显然直接影响到最终性能预测的质量。评估模型质量的最常见方法之一一直是目视检查模拟和测量之间的比较;最高的质量被分配给返回曲线集更接近测量的模型。不幸的是,大量的变量(偏置、频率、功率水平、大信号范围等)可能会引起关注,在这种情况下,很难决定哪个是目标应用程序的最佳模型。因此,准确度评估的问题可以通过定义合适的“度量”来解决,即数值公式,根据模拟和测量之间的最佳拟合,返回可能的无因次量作为模型的性能指标。在这项工作中,从模型验证的角度研究了几个度量。特别是,对HBT和NMOS晶体管模型以及WCDMA基站LDMOS功率放大器模型测试了不同的直流特性、散射参数以及大信号性能指标。讨论了所提出的度量标准的缺点/优点以及可能的解决方案/改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书